Noah Richards
noahsmark.com
Noah Richards
@noahsmark.com
One day I’ll read all the books! he/him.

(@noahsmark on Twitter)
I won’t tell if you won’t!
December 8, 2025 at 6:33 PM
Done, very much loved Obsidian and Blood :) Is there also a way we can donate to you directly?
December 8, 2025 at 6:15 PM
It’s worth considering that its rarity is something other than it being the obvious or easy path. Maybe “everyone going crazy” is the best possible reaction to have to it if we believe that Democratic politicians are overly sensitive and reactive to what they read on social media :)
October 11, 2025 at 6:30 PM
Reposted by Noah Richards
Sometimes I see people like 20 tweets deep into an argument with Grok. Like, what are you doing brother? You are trying to win an argument with a vending machine.
August 18, 2025 at 3:10 AM
What do you want for the denominator? A measure of value? Amortized cost per request? Cloud provider spend as a fraction of all spend? Power usage in the municipalities or states where those clusters live? Which or those paints it in a reasonably light?
August 10, 2025 at 7:54 PM
You’re speed running this right now:
August 10, 2025 at 7:49 PM
If you like Final Fantasy, you’ve picked the perfect time :p

At the prerelease last weekend, two of my three opponents hadn’t played magic in 10+ years and came back for Final Fantasy.
June 17, 2025 at 3:42 AM
Ooo deck list? Here’s mine: moxfield.com/decks/qjZsUW...
Forth, Arabella! - Commander (Arabella, Abandoned Doll)
A deck created using Moxfield.
moxfield.com
June 15, 2025 at 5:26 AM
Gotcha. Looks like Hex Parasite is the only more-than-once-a-turn example and you have Solemnity in the maybeboard, so it reads more like a value play than a storm-off play. Is that a fair read?
June 9, 2025 at 5:56 PM
Re: Noctis and recurrence, I hadn’t thought it was gonna work well since the artifacts come back with finality counters. Are you thinking of adding a mechanism to avoid the finality counters? Or just “cast a set of cheap artifacts ~twice”?
June 9, 2025 at 3:31 PM
Wait, there’s a giant caveat there:

“The estimates below assume that no one who voted in 2020 changed their minds.”

So the “breaking heavily” bit is just: if you *assume*, without evidence, that all the delta comes from new voters. And it looks ~heavy because the denominator is small.
May 8, 2025 at 1:52 PM
Why do you believe that’s lower hanging, that highlighting differences won’t just convince folks that retail workers should earn less?
April 26, 2025 at 4:00 PM
God do these people ever not fail at conflating relevance with usefulness.

Relevant: here’s a product with an addition +20% price! Here’s a knockoff product! Here’s the product you already bought!
April 25, 2025 at 3:08 AM
The core problem is: their output requires significant human work to validate, and that work requires the same level of expertise and often time as it would have taken to generate the content in the first place.
April 24, 2025 at 2:53 AM