10. In other words, in 2012 new production benefited domestic producers AND consumers. But today, new production only benefits producers. That's a fundamentally different policy and political environment. And note also that domestic consumption is basically flat for the last 20 yrs.

Idk, how do you prove this? Is the product of the probability of all those small factors very low?

I found the article very interesting and super insightful, but knowing how you found and defined your Cassandras would add lots of definition to your argument. I assume it wasn't enough to simply have opposed his campaign in 16, was it enough to call him fascist?

How did you identify your non-commentator Cassandras?

Oceans of data on job, education and housing discrimination:
Try harder, losers, stop blaming everyone else

Anecdotal evidence and innumeracy:
There's no point in trying, the deck is stacked against us and it is a great injustice that must be rectified

So wiki + check source != gemini + gemini checked source. I think that's a really important distinction. I'm sure that the llm source check makes its response Better, but still limited in a different way than a human check would be

that's not exactly a wrong description of what they are doing, but it's not equivalent to a human checking the sources of the wiki article. It's not going to be as reliable, for the same reasons hallucinations occur in the initial, unchecked response

Well, I guess I have an intuition for how much and when to trust wikipedia. When I need to be sure, I check the source. Now I'm trying to calibrate my trust of llms. But if you say that the models check their own sources,

And people do put lies/errors on it! They were exactly right!