Nicole Grajewski
banner
nicolegrajewski.bsky.social
Nicole Grajewski
@nicolegrajewski.bsky.social
Fellow with Carnegie’s Nuclear Policy Program and Associate with Harvard’s Managing the Atom | PhD from Oxford | working on nuclear issues involving Russia and Iran | author of Russia and Iran: Partners in Defiance from Syria to Ukraine (OUP/Hurst)
Ahahaha good idea actually might look into that
November 9, 2025 at 7:10 PM
My partner had the brilliant idea of taking them from the HKS library when they were giving it away and they have been a burden ever since
November 9, 2025 at 7:09 PM
Would be a good idea if I had a car ahah
November 9, 2025 at 5:42 PM
Just the system bsky.app/profile/nico...
Putin claims Russia successfully tested the Poseidon nuclear-powered underwater drone: we managed not only to launch it from the carrier submarine using its booster engine, but also to start the nuclear power unit, on which the vehicle operated for a certain period of time. t.co/3dQupIKRKW
https://www.ng.ru/news/827307.html
t.co
October 29, 2025 at 11:46 PM
You basically just have to look at the design bureaus to identify which projects were revived. Peresvet is a clearer example than Burevestnik IMO. Burevestnik seems more of the result of few different designs between NPO Mash and Novator/nuclear-powered aviation/SLVs.
October 29, 2025 at 11:28 PM
We know little about Poseidon beyond the leaked presentation aired on Russian television. Yet, given previous Soviet interest, Poseidon represents less a technical revolution than a persistence of concept. IMO it also has the most interesting history out of the novel weapons.
October 29, 2025 at 11:15 PM
Soviet research institutes modeled such detonations in Lake Ladoga and later on Novaya Zemlya. The studies showed that continental shelves absorb most of the energy — massive waves dissipate rapidly, making large-scale coastal destruction physically unrealistic.
October 29, 2025 at 11:15 PM
One scientist proposed that a tsunami-type wave from a 100-megaton underwater explosion could devastate portions of the U.S. coastline. Khrushchev ordered a study on its potential.
October 29, 2025 at 11:15 PM
The Tsar Bomba test (1961) revived Khrushchev’s interest in ultra-high-yield systems and unconventional delivery methods. Political enthusiasm for “superweapons” spurred renewed exploration of underwater thermonuclear effects.
October 29, 2025 at 11:15 PM
When the Navy finally reviewed it, naval engineers concluded that to launch the T-15, a submarine would have to approach within 40 km of defended coasts, surface for orientation, and expose itself to immediate destruction. The concept was dropped.
October 29, 2025 at 11:15 PM
The T-15 concept was paired with the USSR’s first nuclear-powered submarine, Project 627. The torpedo measured roughly 23m in length, used an electric motor with an approx 30 km range, and carried a multi-megaton warhead. The project advanced without the Navy’s knowledge.
October 29, 2025 at 11:15 PM
The first major attempt was Project T-15 (1949–53), initiated under Sredmash. With no submarine-launched ballistic missiles available, Soviet designers envisioned a very large thermonuclear torpedo capable of striking coastal targets.
October 29, 2025 at 11:15 PM
Naturally, there are contradictory reports on it but it doesn't seem like its going to be 100-300 megatons like some western reports suggested. This one suggests 2 megatons tass.ru/armiya-i-opk...
Источник: подводный аппарат "Посейдон" сможет нести боеголовку мощностью до двух мегатонн
Аппарат будет предназначен для уничтожения укрепленных военно-морских баз потенциального противника, отметил источник ТАСС
tass.ru
October 29, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Iran’s leadership seems to recognize the limits of threshold status. It may mean a reluctance to leverage ambiguity via visible weaponization-related activities or a search for covert, less visible pathways. The direction remains unclear, perhaps even to Iran’s own leadership.
October 17, 2025 at 2:23 PM
Iran’s threshold status or latent deterrent, meanwhile, lacked credibility. It was devoid of a survivable retaliatory capability to impose tangible costs on its opponent. It was merely a signal of potential, not a capability to be actualized in the midst of war.
October 17, 2025 at 2:23 PM