Nate
banner
ngk.bsky.social
Nate
@ngk.bsky.social
Design & architecture, riding bikes, thinking about better societies (tough time) and REALLY living when I’m doing the robot https://nategk.co
June 9, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Wait what is that and how can I invest
May 24, 2025 at 1:11 AM
Sent an email to 07-pchmpfs@publicinput.com in support of overall effort and urge to connect bike lanes where they end from Santa Monica at Temescal. 💥

Project: engage.dot.ca.gov/j77248
Draft PCH Master Plan Feasibility Study Document - PublicInput
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) seeks public comment on the Draft Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) Master Plan Feasibility Study which focuses on approximately 21 miles of PCH in Mal...
engage.dot.ca.gov
May 24, 2025 at 12:16 AM
engage.dot.ca.gov/07-pchmsfsr2 Caltrans is conducting a study and ran a survey that’s now closed, but it looks promising.
Pacific Coast Highway Master Plan Feasibility Study Round Two Survey - PublicInput
Caltrans District 7 is developing the PCH Master Plan Feasibility Study this is a Round Two of a survey to ask your preferences about possible modifications to the Pacific Coast Highway (PCH). | Spani...
engage.dot.ca.gov
May 23, 2025 at 11:33 PM
Well I went down the rabbit hole and PCH plan is state highway planning jurisdiction. (See public comment 3 on the same theme.) I’ll see where that leads!. pw.lacounty.gov/core-service...
pw.lacounty.gov
May 23, 2025 at 11:27 PM
Do you know who specifically? I think the PCH disaster recovery aspect was mostly Caltrans, US army and LA emergency dept for broader plan—with governor’s office too. Agree that mandate is more “cleanup and reopen.”

Who leads vision and planning for what the PCH should be?
May 23, 2025 at 10:44 PM
Thank you for the speed in addressing this!

Rebuilding the PCH is an opportunity to extend bike and pedestrian paths North, from the Palisades.

Today paths dissolve into dangerous riding and walking along highway shoulders. An opportunity for better living and less congestion. Could it happen?
May 23, 2025 at 10:02 PM
Houses that were built to withstand fires didn’t burn. All houses near burn zones should be required to be more resilient. Financial assistance under certain income levels to do so. This is an area where regulation is obviously a good and productive thing.
March 13, 2025 at 3:24 PM
Correct take
February 20, 2025 at 4:27 AM
Love that
February 20, 2025 at 4:26 AM
Great point and unnecessarily confusing word! Maybe just say progressive organizing against moderates.
February 18, 2025 at 12:44 PM
Spotify needs a “surprise me” playlist — if there’s an algorithm, you don’t know what it is
January 30, 2025 at 8:22 AM