Neutron Decay
LightNews LightNews
banner
neutrondecay.bsky.social
Neutron Decay
@neutrondecay.bsky.social
75 followers 78 following 510 posts
One of those terrible queers you've heard about.
https://ko-fi.com/neutrondecay
Posts Replies Media Videos
neutrondecay.bsky.social
Just realised why. I'm sorry this coming round again. You deserve better.
December 9, 2025 at 11:26 AM
Reposted by Neutron Decay
serenadtyl.bsky.social
Oh this was good.

"Whilst the claimant argued that Ms Forstater was not presented as an expert witness, in our view that is
essentially what she was doing. She was giving evidence on matters of opinion dressed up as matters of fact."
December 8, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Reposted by Neutron Decay
jessothomson.co.uk
Overall, they conclude:

"It may be lawful to grant permission to a trans person to use the changing room that aligns with the sex and gender they identify as having, dependent on the circumstances."

Quite contrary to what anti-trans campaigners have been arguing FWS means - isn't it?
In summary we rejected the claimant’s argument. The Supreme Court’s decision has the conclusion that a trans woman is not a woman for the purposes of sex under section 11. For a question of which changing room to use that is not in our view determinative. The protected characteristic of gender reassignment is not to be wholly disregarded as it is of equal status to sex (as are the respective beliefs of the claimant and second respondent). It may be lawful to grant permission to a trans person to use the changing room that aligns with the sex and gender they identify as having, dependent on the circumstances. Whether or not it was in relation to the second respondent, and how that is to be determined, are separate points which we address below.
December 8, 2025 at 3:21 PM