Robin
@neoky.bsky.social
Naughty artist, gamer, musician, gardener, brewer of mead and hard ciders, 🏳️⚧️
Reposted by Robin
7. The statute itself declares that one purpose of the ban is to “encourage minors to appreciate their sex,” and yet the majority still concludes it does not constitute sex-based classification. Sotomayor dismantles that claim with precision in her dissent, exposing the logical inconsistency:
June 18, 2025 at 7:54 PM
7. The statute itself declares that one purpose of the ban is to “encourage minors to appreciate their sex,” and yet the majority still concludes it does not constitute sex-based classification. Sotomayor dismantles that claim with precision in her dissent, exposing the logical inconsistency:
I swear, it's like their strategy is to allow maga to completely destroy our nation and democracy, and they think they can use it as a platform to run on in 2026. If they don't have the backbone to fight now, who's going to think they'll have the backbone to fight if they have power?
March 17, 2025 at 1:38 PM
I swear, it's like their strategy is to allow maga to completely destroy our nation and democracy, and they think they can use it as a platform to run on in 2026. If they don't have the backbone to fight now, who's going to think they'll have the backbone to fight if they have power?