neitherhipnorfunky.bsky.social
@neitherhipnorfunky.bsky.social
Reposted by neitherhipnorfunky.bsky.social
The other sin here is thinking that these issues are separable in the first place. They aren't. These dots are not separate or even separable issues. Believing that you can parse anti-DEI from "RFK Jr. And Science" and "trans issues" as if they're not intimately linked is beyond foolish.
We can quibble about the placement of each item but the original sin here is the very existence of this graph. Why on earth would a news organization rank social issues like they're weapons in an RPG?
Of course the NYT sees the "DEI" stuff positively & is neutral on anti-trans discrimination
March 1, 2025 at 6:46 PM
The other sin here is thinking that these issues are separable in the first place. They aren't. These dots are not separate or even separable issues. Believing that you can parse anti-DEI from "RFK Jr. And Science" and "trans issues" as if they're not intimately linked is beyond foolish.
Reposted by neitherhipnorfunky.bsky.social
democrats: oh my goodness. can he DO that?
democrats: (continue to let him do that)
democrats: he just DID that. give us $100
democrats: (continue to let him do that)
democrats: he just DID that. give us $100
January 21, 2025 at 1:24 AM
democrats: oh my goodness. can he DO that?
democrats: (continue to let him do that)
democrats: he just DID that. give us $100
democrats: (continue to let him do that)
democrats: he just DID that. give us $100