I mean, I've only heard of one of those three, and that's only because they were married to a world famous rock/metal star. I suppose "1,200 Hollywood nobodies" doesn't quite have the same ring to it, though. Makes them easier to boycott when you have no idea who they are aside from this letter.

"War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength."

“You don’t want AI to tell recovering meth addicts to take meth? Why are you such a Luddite???”

Have been using DuckDuckGo almost exclusively for the past couple of years and it's very good. Recently decided to hide the Google search app on my phone to force me to avoid it even more.

"Blast my cache!"

youtu.be/elA6WDvKGG0

If he didn't want it plaguing his reputation, perhaps he should've carried out the investigations into serious allegations like he was supposed to at the time. 🤷‍♂️

Bishops, Archbishops, and Cardinals have this authority. He was alerted to sexual assault allegations whilst in these senior roles and did not act. I won't "give him a break," he covered for paedophiles.

“It is the duty of the *LOCAL BISHOP* to conduct a serious investigation once he has received an allegation bearing a ‘semblance of truth;’..."

He had authority and a duty to do so at the time. Investigations for rank and file priests don't just originate from the pope... 🤦‍♂️

shorturl.at/fzvLj

That's partly the problem. If he couldn't be trusted to take sexual assault allegations seriously as a cardinal, then he's not fit to be in an even higher position now.

He's been pope for a day, but he sat on allegations for years. He's disgusting.

The extent of supervision from senior Catholic clergy:

youtu.be/75ILEuhFZ94

He also sheltered a paedophile at St. John Stone Friary, after a review board had denied it due to its proximity to a grade school (2 min walk). Here's an expert from that priest's personnel file.

Also failed to act on sexual abuse claims in Peru: www.bishop-accountability.org/2024/09/card...