November 24, 2025 at 1:47 PM
agree, nobody can compete with jetbrains, nobody
I love vscode, too, I use both even (vscode is my small-ish/side editor) but jetbrains just has a level of polish and comfort that vscode does not.
I love vscode, too, I use both even (vscode is my small-ish/side editor) but jetbrains just has a level of polish and comfort that vscode does not.
November 24, 2025 at 11:52 AM
agree, nobody can compete with jetbrains, nobody
I love vscode, too, I use both even (vscode is my small-ish/side editor) but jetbrains just has a level of polish and comfort that vscode does not.
I love vscode, too, I use both even (vscode is my small-ish/side editor) but jetbrains just has a level of polish and comfort that vscode does not.
youtube.com/shorts/F_lzU...
I got reminded about this reply when I saw this video. 🥹 Women should bring these back tbh
(also, I saw your post about the french pastries - you two have fun!!)
I got reminded about this reply when I saw this video. 🥹 Women should bring these back tbh
(also, I saw your post about the french pastries - you two have fun!!)
Imagine owning a pair of these gloves... #history #art
YouTube video by History by Mae
youtube.com
November 22, 2025 at 4:39 PM
youtube.com/shorts/F_lzU...
I got reminded about this reply when I saw this video. 🥹 Women should bring these back tbh
(also, I saw your post about the french pastries - you two have fun!!)
I got reminded about this reply when I saw this video. 🥹 Women should bring these back tbh
(also, I saw your post about the french pastries - you two have fun!!)
Fingerprinting works by relying on many data points being the same per device.
If you randomly exchanged the data points between users or made them static across all, wouldn't the amount of reliable points be reduced, improving privacy?
I'm not sure, was just a thought.
If you randomly exchanged the data points between users or made them static across all, wouldn't the amount of reliable points be reduced, improving privacy?
I'm not sure, was just a thought.
November 20, 2025 at 4:32 PM
Fingerprinting works by relying on many data points being the same per device.
If you randomly exchanged the data points between users or made them static across all, wouldn't the amount of reliable points be reduced, improving privacy?
I'm not sure, was just a thought.
If you randomly exchanged the data points between users or made them static across all, wouldn't the amount of reliable points be reduced, improving privacy?
I'm not sure, was just a thought.
Question re: fingerprinting
I looked at the impl. of an open source fingerprinting library. It used device-related functions to create a hash out of all results, and I wonder:
Would making a browser addon that makes these results static - or share among the addon user base - make them ineffective?
I looked at the impl. of an open source fingerprinting library. It used device-related functions to create a hash out of all results, and I wonder:
Would making a browser addon that makes these results static - or share among the addon user base - make them ineffective?
November 20, 2025 at 4:28 PM
Question re: fingerprinting
I looked at the impl. of an open source fingerprinting library. It used device-related functions to create a hash out of all results, and I wonder:
Would making a browser addon that makes these results static - or share among the addon user base - make them ineffective?
I looked at the impl. of an open source fingerprinting library. It used device-related functions to create a hash out of all results, and I wonder:
Would making a browser addon that makes these results static - or share among the addon user base - make them ineffective?
I've been listening to "The First Law"! I 'm on book 4 and I like it so far - it is not short, though, but that's what I was looking for!
What have you been reading?
What have you been reading?
November 20, 2025 at 4:04 PM
I've been listening to "The First Law"! I 'm on book 4 and I like it so far - it is not short, though, but that's what I was looking for!
What have you been reading?
What have you been reading?
I'm not sure if it will ever be a big thing though, but that's fine!
I'd guess the reason women's day is so popular/celebrated is probably even *because* of the past and current oppression, but I'm not educated enough on that specifically.
I'd guess the reason women's day is so popular/celebrated is probably even *because* of the past and current oppression, but I'm not educated enough on that specifically.
November 20, 2025 at 3:17 PM
I'm not sure if it will ever be a big thing though, but that's fine!
I'd guess the reason women's day is so popular/celebrated is probably even *because* of the past and current oppression, but I'm not educated enough on that specifically.
I'd guess the reason women's day is so popular/celebrated is probably even *because* of the past and current oppression, but I'm not educated enough on that specifically.
Oh. I genuinely think I didn't hear about it before, so yeah, you're right.
That said, the men asking "why is there no men's day?" are probably asking this bc there is a women's day, not bc they would love to organize a men's day (if that makes sense).
That said, the men asking "why is there no men's day?" are probably asking this bc there is a women's day, not bc they would love to organize a men's day (if that makes sense).
November 20, 2025 at 3:17 PM
Oh. I genuinely think I didn't hear about it before, so yeah, you're right.
That said, the men asking "why is there no men's day?" are probably asking this bc there is a women's day, not bc they would love to organize a men's day (if that makes sense).
That said, the men asking "why is there no men's day?" are probably asking this bc there is a women's day, not bc they would love to organize a men's day (if that makes sense).