Bluesky shouldn't be a thing and i'm sad this took all the users who could've learnt to actually use decentralized social media and discovering the world can be an actual human place for human interaction.
Saw this on fedi btw, I dunno why I still have an account here tho

BTW as far as I know twitter still says they do this, as an example of how easy can a company swing out of thin air.
Steam does this too (they protect both nazis and gay people, somehow, almost never the gay people tho, and never the trans people, or almost never, you already know the deal).

And once again, NEVER believe they will do the right thing.
They won't.
Even more on a social media site.
This is a tool that WILL be used to punish whatever they feel like, due to the grey areas.
Hello and cheers to all the 3 bots and 2 humans who will read this. And goodbye too.

And *sigh* if people said Itchio was not your friend after they tried to save the money of millions of users in some way, that same people should leave this place ASAP.
At least itchio is hand reviewing everything, added good guidelines to follow and yadda yadda.

So yeah, as it is written right now, this new control thing seems just like a excuse to handpick which stuff they consider immoral and which they consider moral, as no guideline is put on there to have a -minimal- quantity of context for a post to be valid.

This is a very meta thing, but with OCs and self-inserts you get into the nitty gritty dubious stuff. Not so say there is an entire fetish with creator-creation relationship, which is minoritary, but it's there.

Going a step further, all fantastical depictions could be considered non-consensual, as you should need consent from the fictional character to post them doing flip flops on top of someone else on the world wide web. Problem is they don't exist, so you technically just control them overall.

So the consent done in a possible way is something like "i just draw this girl saying she consents to being fucked by a minotaur that will break her ribs, in a simpler pic, on the side", which means that you have 0 context of when this consent was given, as it has no path from one to another.

The reason why you need A LOT of text to explain porn in a meaningful way is that you can face situations like:
-Adult character that acts like a child, not by roleplay, but by mental disability.
-The latina theorem with a very adult character with a tiny body.
-Consent being done in a possible way.

Tbh I didn't know the asians had trouble about this thing, but some seem to have had this problem (mostly women and onlyfans and stuff like that, previously I had only known people from philippines and some latinas). But here we are, learning some new stuff that kinda makes sense.

When reported by human beings (fuck that's rough) and reviewed by human beings, nothing automated (even more rough).
What this allows, then, is for an easy access to campaign against NSFW artists, if done otherwise, based on certain fetish or certain bodytype gatekeeping (asian is the most common).

The cheapest way for the artist to actually have a safe way to know they won't get banned would be to allow a 400 words post in which you explain the context previous to the interaction on the screen, with ages of the characters and so.
Then all of those should be hand reviewed when reported.

What do we do with that? Technically it isn't NSFW, it's contextual to the situation in a very known way, everyone SHOULD get why it is posted that way (to demonstrate a fault in the system). Would it get banned? Would it be okay? How many gray areas are we allowing?

Now for the actual tips:

Now for the consent part, which I would test if I wasn't afraid of people here being unable to take in a joke.
If someone records a video, due to this policy, of a friend gagged and simulating a very distressful situation, while the poster goes "they consent, this is all fine", coded as a joke...

Now, can I use the excuse that this baby-looking thing is a 2000 y/o dragon?No?Okay then this petite latina who is 27 and has a body that a 27 y/o person can have is considered minor or not?A bit of a step further,are asian people banned from porn as deducing their actual age is harder for the west?