Natasha Jaques
@natashajaques.bsky.social
Assistant Professor at UW and Staff Research Scientist at Google DeepMind. Social Reinforcement Learning in multi-agent and human-AI interactions. PhD from MIT. Check out https://socialrl.cs.washington.edu/ and https://natashajaques.ai/.
Got a weird combination of mail today.
April 12, 2025 at 5:04 PM
Got a weird combination of mail today.
Impressive results that strongly outperform the best classical techniques. Several MARL methods work well, showing the promise of MARL for combinatorial optimization and systems problems, as in our earlier work on MARL for Microprocessor Design arxiv.org/abs/2211.16385 3/3
January 2, 2025 at 10:33 PM
Impressive results that strongly outperform the best classical techniques. Several MARL methods work well, showing the promise of MARL for combinatorial optimization and systems problems, as in our earlier work on MARL for Microprocessor Design arxiv.org/abs/2211.16385 3/3
The paper I spoke about at the #NeurIPS2024 ML for Systems workshop is now on arxiv arxiv.org/abs/2412.15573! We use multi-agent RL to solve a classic combinatorial optimization problem (the Sequential Assignment Problem), by combining MARL with a classical polynomial time assignment algorithm. 1/3
January 2, 2025 at 10:32 PM
The paper I spoke about at the #NeurIPS2024 ML for Systems workshop is now on arxiv arxiv.org/abs/2412.15573! We use multi-agent RL to solve a classic combinatorial optimization problem (the Sequential Assignment Problem), by combining MARL with a classical polynomial time assignment algorithm. 1/3
So I tried to post on X about how I'm moving to BlueSky and why. The tweet got less than 10% of the views of my 5 most recent tweets. Think the algorithm is suppressing this information?
Once again, so much for a "free and open town square".
Once again, so much for a "free and open town square".
November 21, 2024 at 10:58 PM
So I tried to post on X about how I'm moving to BlueSky and why. The tweet got less than 10% of the views of my 5 most recent tweets. Think the algorithm is suppressing this information?
Once again, so much for a "free and open town square".
Once again, so much for a "free and open town square".