are not applied on an individual level. And finally, 4) found a technical way to refute SRB arguments which did not require doing 1), 2) and 3). Please share your thoughts!

3) —> created a loophole allowing controllers to outsource questionable analytics to 3rd parties after pseudonymisation,
possibly avoiding legal scrutiny if analytics results are 3/x

2) it waltzed too easily out of the language of Recital 16(26 GDPR) & Bryer re likelihood of identification assessed from the perspective of controller or any other person, creating fertile ground for subjective approach to identifiability & an increased uncertainty as to when data is personal 2/x

My condolences to his family, friends and colleagues. He will be missed

2-3 papers for each paper submitted seems fair to me

I just thought of the same paper! Didn’t lose relevance in the 20 years!