Given that this wasn’t published in a scientific journal, nor peer reviewed, why did you ignore earlier published, peer reviewed research demonstrating a time restricted ketogenic diet effective at treating/partially reversing a variety of Huntington’s Disease symptoms?

Given that this wasn’t published in a scientific journal, nor peer reviewed at this point, why did you ignore earlier published, peer reviewed research demonstrating a time restricted ketogenic diet effective at treating/partially reversing a variety of Huntington’s Disease symptoms?

Why didn’t earlier peer reviewed research (by Phillips et al.) demonstrating a time restricted ketogenic diet effective at treating a variety of Huntington’s Disease symptoms get the same kind of love?

Why are you lying about this being the first effective treatment, though? You realize the Internet and Google Scholar exist, no?

Did Nature forget about earlier research demonstrating significant improvements in Huntington’s symptoms with a time restricted ketogenic diet? Because I’m pretty sure that altered the course of HD before AMT-130 did (assuming it did), no?

Not the first time, though, now is it?

“First to show substantial benefit”? Why doesn’t the earlier research demonstrating symptom improvement in Huntington’s Disease with a far less invasive (not to mention much more affordable) dietary approach (time restricted ketogenic diet) count, by contrast? What is/are the relevant differences?

Fact check: false.

How can it be the first time when there’s earlier researcher describing similar improvements with a far less invasive, and much more affordable, dietary intervention? Why did the BBC ignore this earlier breakthrough, by contrast?

“First treatment”, eh? Why doesn’t the earlier research demonstrating symptom improvement in Huntington’s Disease with a far less invasive (not to mention much more affordable) dietary approach (time restricted ketogenic diet) count, by contrast? What is/are the relevant differences?

“For the first time, there’s hope…”

First time, eh? Why doesn’t the earlier research demonstrating symptom improvement in Huntington’s with a far less invasive dietary approach (time restricted ketogenic diet) count, by contrast? What’s the relevant difference?

First time, eh? Even though this one came before it? Hmm…

It’s a screenshot of something I wrote up in response to this story.

Speaking of Mount Isa and genetic mutations in response to pollution problems:

amp.abc.net.au/article/1029...