I am sceptical any of this can be reliably done by LLM-type automation. But I appreciate your sincere intentions and hard work.

And quite likely AI review attempts will make it worse, by suggesting peer review is something that can be automated and is not worth spending the time on, which is exactly the opposite of what we should think if we were to start reading/reviewing/discussing each other's work more.

Wait until I show you my calculator.

From my little experience, I have seen examples that would fit to what @neural-reckoning.org says (articulating uncertainties half-articulated by the authors), as well as those that are more like mirroring other reviews it was trained on.

Our focus is on structural and evolutionary aspects. Which SUMO surfaces and residues mediate its different interactions? How is SUMO distinguished from ubiquitin to create a specific, orthogonal PTM system? What do the surface properties of SUMO imply for the evolution of its binders and function?