Ms. Elise
@mselise.bsky.social
I'm vaguely an engineer and not vaguely a massive nerd. TERFs not welcome.
Reposted by Ms. Elise
If you would think the rule was good, and would not revisit it for someone you don't really know that well, or someone you hate, you should not revisit it because it applies to someone you like.
This feels like an element of fundamental fairness.
This feels like an element of fundamental fairness.
December 20, 2025 at 5:33 PM
If you would think the rule was good, and would not revisit it for someone you don't really know that well, or someone you hate, you should not revisit it because it applies to someone you like.
This feels like an element of fundamental fairness.
This feels like an element of fundamental fairness.
Reposted by Ms. Elise
If the rule is otherwise good and someone who we all appreciate and respect has their work excluded for a year, them's the breaks.
December 20, 2025 at 5:32 PM
If the rule is otherwise good and someone who we all appreciate and respect has their work excluded for a year, them's the breaks.
Reposted by Ms. Elise
The rule should not be chosen based on who it excludes.
If the rule means that the output of an entire publishing house, which goes AI-edit forward in 2026, is excluded, the rule is functioning as intended.
If the rule means that the output of an entire publishing house, which goes AI-edit forward in 2026, is excluded, the rule is functioning as intended.
December 20, 2025 at 5:31 PM
The rule should not be chosen based on who it excludes.
If the rule means that the output of an entire publishing house, which goes AI-edit forward in 2026, is excluded, the rule is functioning as intended.
If the rule means that the output of an entire publishing house, which goes AI-edit forward in 2026, is excluded, the rule is functioning as intended.
Reposted by Ms. Elise
2) when deciding if a clear rule is a GOOD rule, the absolute last thing you should be doing is crafting a rule and then looking to see if it excludes people you like and respect and frantically redrafting it if it does so that those people are eligible for your contest
December 20, 2025 at 5:30 PM
2) when deciding if a clear rule is a GOOD rule, the absolute last thing you should be doing is crafting a rule and then looking to see if it excludes people you like and respect and frantically redrafting it if it does so that those people are eligible for your contest
Reposted by Ms. Elise
I am losing my mind
DO ANY OF THESE JOURNALISTS KNOW THAT VENEZUELA IS NOT ON THE PACIFIC
THAT THE CARIBBEAN SEA DOES NOT TOUCH THE PACIFIC
THAT IN FACT THIS IS WHAT THE PANAMA CANAL WAS BUILT FOR
WTF IS THE EASTERN PACIFIC
PLEASE LOOK AT A MAP
DO ANY OF THESE JOURNALISTS KNOW THAT VENEZUELA IS NOT ON THE PACIFIC
THAT THE CARIBBEAN SEA DOES NOT TOUCH THE PACIFIC
THAT IN FACT THIS IS WHAT THE PANAMA CANAL WAS BUILT FOR
WTF IS THE EASTERN PACIFIC
PLEASE LOOK AT A MAP
December 16, 2025 at 1:00 PM
I am losing my mind
DO ANY OF THESE JOURNALISTS KNOW THAT VENEZUELA IS NOT ON THE PACIFIC
THAT THE CARIBBEAN SEA DOES NOT TOUCH THE PACIFIC
THAT IN FACT THIS IS WHAT THE PANAMA CANAL WAS BUILT FOR
WTF IS THE EASTERN PACIFIC
PLEASE LOOK AT A MAP
DO ANY OF THESE JOURNALISTS KNOW THAT VENEZUELA IS NOT ON THE PACIFIC
THAT THE CARIBBEAN SEA DOES NOT TOUCH THE PACIFIC
THAT IN FACT THIS IS WHAT THE PANAMA CANAL WAS BUILT FOR
WTF IS THE EASTERN PACIFIC
PLEASE LOOK AT A MAP