@mrborelli.bsky.social
The regular season does matter, as the ND win is what's keeping Miami in the picture. Swap out the ND win for, say, an FIU drubbing, and keep everything else the same, Miami wouldn't even be in the conversation.
December 1, 2025 at 9:05 PM
The regular season does matter, as the ND win is what's keeping Miami in the picture. Swap out the ND win for, say, an FIU drubbing, and keep everything else the same, Miami wouldn't even be in the conversation.
Miami needs to start pointing at Oklahoma and Alabama, two teams I would readily concede look worse than Miami right now. Five teams in is not an SEC birthright.
December 1, 2025 at 8:56 PM
Miami needs to start pointing at Oklahoma and Alabama, two teams I would readily concede look worse than Miami right now. Five teams in is not an SEC birthright.
Witness prep is an ongoing process.
November 20, 2025 at 5:56 PM
Witness prep is an ongoing process.
Theoretically but most prosecutors don't treat their legal obligations and responsibilities like a suggestion list, if for nothing else the very consequences we're seeing play out here.
November 17, 2025 at 6:24 PM
Theoretically but most prosecutors don't treat their legal obligations and responsibilities like a suggestion list, if for nothing else the very consequences we're seeing play out here.
No, judges aren't in grand jury proceedings. It's the prosecutor's show.
November 17, 2025 at 6:02 PM
No, judges aren't in grand jury proceedings. It's the prosecutor's show.
I am a lawyer. It's incredibly not legal.
November 17, 2025 at 6:01 PM
I am a lawyer. It's incredibly not legal.
Is the Lion enough of an asshole?
November 13, 2025 at 4:46 PM
Is the Lion enough of an asshole?
Brian Kelly - Angron
November 13, 2025 at 2:47 PM
Brian Kelly - Angron
The phrase "indicia of reliability" comes to mind.
November 12, 2025 at 2:58 PM
The phrase "indicia of reliability" comes to mind.
Taking a tangent, here: any concerns about the concurrences arguing to replace current First Amendment law with a Bruen-style standard? I assume FIRE was not advancing that argument.
November 7, 2025 at 5:56 PM
Taking a tangent, here: any concerns about the concurrences arguing to replace current First Amendment law with a Bruen-style standard? I assume FIRE was not advancing that argument.
The utter disrespect shown to the work of the district court judges is just shocking. In the normal course, overturning the findings of fact is so outside the norm appellate courts devote copious analysis and justification as to why. Apparently not on the shadow docket.
November 7, 2025 at 3:14 AM
The utter disrespect shown to the work of the district court judges is just shocking. In the normal course, overturning the findings of fact is so outside the norm appellate courts devote copious analysis and justification as to why. Apparently not on the shadow docket.
It's not. The Court stated that the District Court didn't do the proper analysis for a finding of facial violation of the First Amendment, as opposed to as applied, and remanded for further proceedings. Even the dissent agreed with this.
November 6, 2025 at 4:26 PM
It's not. The Court stated that the District Court didn't do the proper analysis for a finding of facial violation of the First Amendment, as opposed to as applied, and remanded for further proceedings. Even the dissent agreed with this.
Buckle up, DOJ.
November 6, 2025 at 4:16 PM
Buckle up, DOJ.
I didn't even have to look to know it was Ross Douthat.
November 6, 2025 at 3:20 PM
I didn't even have to look to know it was Ross Douthat.
Cynicism and ironic detachment is how we got into this mess in the first place.
November 6, 2025 at 3:16 PM
Cynicism and ironic detachment is how we got into this mess in the first place.
Even better, she's retained Klayman!
November 6, 2025 at 2:22 AM
Even better, she's retained Klayman!
It would be interesting to see what happens if more of the general citizenry were aware that there is essentially no remedy for the federal government violating their rights.
November 6, 2025 at 1:31 AM
It would be interesting to see what happens if more of the general citizenry were aware that there is essentially no remedy for the federal government violating their rights.
I believe 1983 only applies to state governments. The only federal equivalent is the Bivens case, which has been so pared down that the joke is you get relief only if you are Bivens.
November 6, 2025 at 1:25 AM
I believe 1983 only applies to state governments. The only federal equivalent is the Bivens case, which has been so pared down that the joke is you get relief only if you are Bivens.