@mose-in-socks.bsky.social
Ahh, the "more of something with less efficacy" theorem. More is more and more is better, right?
It doesn't sound good because it *isn't* good. Except maybe for wheelbarrow, basket and tote makers - since everyone will cart around mass amounts of near worthless banknotes to cover a loaf of bread.
It doesn't sound good because it *isn't* good. Except maybe for wheelbarrow, basket and tote makers - since everyone will cart around mass amounts of near worthless banknotes to cover a loaf of bread.
July 25, 2025 at 4:19 PM
Ahh, the "more of something with less efficacy" theorem. More is more and more is better, right?
It doesn't sound good because it *isn't* good. Except maybe for wheelbarrow, basket and tote makers - since everyone will cart around mass amounts of near worthless banknotes to cover a loaf of bread.
It doesn't sound good because it *isn't* good. Except maybe for wheelbarrow, basket and tote makers - since everyone will cart around mass amounts of near worthless banknotes to cover a loaf of bread.