mmclane12.bsky.social
@mmclane12.bsky.social
Reposted
Let me say again: Iran said it had a new enrichment facility. The IAEA was about to go see a new (empty) enrichment facility. But before that could happen, Israel struck other facilities in Iran -- but not the new one. See the problem? 10/17
June 23, 2025 at 1:27 AM
Reposted
The 400 kg of HEU was largely stored in underground tunnels near the Isfahan Uranium Conversion Facility. Despite extensive Israeli and US attacks the facility, there does not seem to have been any effort to destroy these tunnels or the material that was in them. 3/17
June 23, 2025 at 1:27 AM
Reposted
Netanyahu's justification for conducting this strike was that "Iran has produced enough highly enriched uranium for nine atom bombs -- nine." He refers to Iran's stockpile of ~400 kg of 60% U-235 which, if further enriched, would be enough for 9-10 weapons. Let's consider. 2/17
June 23, 2025 at 1:27 AM
fewer workers supporting those services.

Trump is determined to destroy our economy after we have started to recover!
June 23, 2025 at 3:06 AM
Reposted
But if you read the baude article the argument is obviously more nuanced than “the executive has unilateral authority to decide whether a court properly exercised jurisdiction”—and explicitly mentions the possibility of the jurisdictional question being resolved by a court via contempt proceedings
March 30, 2025 at 4:58 AM
Reposted
March 30, 2025 at 5:05 AM