Mix
LightNews LightNews
mixt.bsky.social
Mix
@mixt.bsky.social
73 followers 78 following 12 posts
Trans masc enby, therapist, polyamorous person who makes stuff and watches a lot of women’s sports!
Posts Replies Media Videos
mixt.bsky.social
But he took over mid-season from the guy who was supposed to make us the best, and did even better than him with key players injured/on maternity leave through the whole thing. CB7 only played half a year and still got ROTY. If you do it well enough, you don’t need the whole season to be the best 🤷‍♂️
November 11, 2025 at 2:33 PM
mixt.bsky.social
@medstarhealth.bsky.social as a mental healthcare prover myself, I highly recommend actually having SME on gender review your forms. The language about gender is absolute nonsense. Gender and sex are different- I’d expect a huge healthcare system to understand this very basic thing.
October 24, 2025 at 2:33 PM
mixt.bsky.social
Are groceries cheaper yet?
October 10, 2025 at 9:52 PM
mixt.bsky.social
Right?! It seems to be a universal thing t boy thing! It’s the belly fuzz!
September 17, 2025 at 3:28 AM
mixt.bsky.social
The reffing in this league is EMBARRASSING. World class athletes being reffed by people who should have never been promoted beyond recreational leagues.
August 16, 2025 at 2:26 AM
Reposted by Mix
kerryanncoder.bsky.social
I'm estranged from my parents. So... no. When you *show* them the plan for *your genocide* in Project 2025, and they still vote for Trump?

What other message am I supposed to take from that other than: We don't love you?
July 13, 2025 at 8:39 PM
mixt.bsky.social
YEP! As soon as I see her on the field, I know it’s gonna be a rough one
May 18, 2025 at 1:57 AM
Reposted by Mix
ktelliottmicro.bsky.social
Agreed! (With alt text for those who need it)
Judge Reyes: EO 14183 adopts the definitions of a separate executive order called Defending Women from Gender Ideology, Extremism and Restoring biological Truth to the federal government. And that EO states, "sex shall refer to an individual's immutable biological classification as either male or female." And it states that, "It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female." Do you see that or do you remember that? Jason C. Lynch:| will take the court's word for it. Judge Reyes: You understand, as a matter of biology, it's just incorrect that there are only two sexes, right? Jason C. Lynch: Do I understand that to be incorrect as a biological matter? Judge Reyes: Yes. It is incorrect as a biological matter. You understand that, right? Jason C. Lynch: I don't understand that to be incorrect. Judge Reyes: You understand that not everyone has an xx or an xy chromosome, right? Jason C. Lynch: Honestly, no, I don't. Judge Reyes: It's actually kind of a really important point because this executive order is premised on an assertion that's not biologically correct. There are anywhere near about 30 different intersex examples. So someone who does not have just xx or xy chromosome is not just male or female. They're intersex. And there are over 30 potential different intersex examples. We've got genetic differences. We have people with xxx chromosomes. We have androgen insensitivity, xy genetically, that may have female external sex characteristics and internally have testes. There's a five alpha reductase deficiency that causes changes in testosterone metabolism, xy that may have female external genitalia or ambiguous genitalia. The point being, and I'm happy to have you guys brief this more if you want, but I'm telling you right now that there are people who are neither male or female. And so the premise of the executive order is just incorrect.
February 19, 2025 at 5:55 PM
mixt.bsky.social
This feels… accurate
January 2, 2025 at 4:47 PM