The omission of "how much" plutonium-239 and explaining the process in a fearful fashion is quite malicious.
This type of news is where low-trust environments propagate from. There will never be a retraction, because nuclear + CIA + cool UI = clicks.
The omission of "how much" plutonium-239 and explaining the process in a fearful fashion is quite malicious.
This type of news is where low-trust environments propagate from. There will never be a retraction, because nuclear + CIA + cool UI = clicks.
Because I'm a year and a half late on this guy, and he almost certainly is in the process of committing a giant financial fraud scheme.
Because I'm a year and a half late on this guy, and he almost certainly is in the process of committing a giant financial fraud scheme.
Not "I think," but "I know." I feel a moral drive not to sit on this information, that's fucking insane.
Not "I think," but "I know." I feel a moral drive not to sit on this information, that's fucking insane.
Like I know why they exist but when AARs are produced from these, how can anything positive be written? Like what was learned, taught vs the last year?
Like I know why they exist but when AARs are produced from these, how can anything positive be written? Like what was learned, taught vs the last year?