Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Reposted

Institute for Planetary Health Behaviour

@ipb.bsky.social

#SaveTheDate Haben Sie schon mal mit unserem Ökosystem telefoniert? ☎️🌍 Gast unserer nächsten Ausgabe von #ClimateConnect ist Klimakommunikations-Designer Falko Saalfeld, Ideengeber bei @mother-earth.bsky.social. Kann #KI helfen, Menschen auf eine neue Art & Weise für Klimaschutz zu sensibilisieren?

Climate Connect: Wie fühlt es sich an, mit Mutter Erde KI zu telefonieren? Und was, wenn Madmen Klimaschutz vermarkten würden?

Das Institute for Planetary Health Behaviour der Universität Erfurt lädt zur nächsten Veranstaltung in der Reihe "Climate Connect" ein. Zu Gast ist diesmal Falko Saalfeld, Ideengeber bei MotherEarth.A...

www.uni-erfurt.de

March 4, 2025 at 4:06 PM

Reposted

Stefan Herzog

@stefanherzog.bsky.social

🌟🧠💪📝
#BOOSTING: Empowering citizens with behavioral science

New, freely available paper in Annual Review of Psychology.
PDF: tinyurl.com/boosting2025

For more: scienceofboosting.org

@arc-mpib.bsky.social @mpib-berlin.bsky.social

@annualreviews.bsky.social
#policy #behavioralscience

1/ 🧵👇

The image is the cover page of an article from the "Annual Review of Psychology" titled "Boosting: Empowering Citizens with Behavioral Science" by Stefan M. Herzog and Ralph Hertwig. It features a brief abstract, keywords, and publication details. The abstract outlines the concept of "boosting" as a behavioral public policy that emphasizes empowering individuals to make informed decisions, in contrast to "nudging," which subtly steers behavior. The abstract reads:

Behavioral public policy came to the fore with the introduction of nudging, which aims to steer behavior while maintaining freedom of choice. Responding to critiques of nudging (e.g., that it does not promote agency and relies on benevolent choice architects), other behavioral policy approaches focus on empowering citizens. Here we review boosting, a behavioral policy approach that aims to foster people's agency, self-control, and ability to make informed decisions. It is grounded in evidence from behavioral science showing that human decision making is not as notoriously flawed as the nudging approach assumes. We argue that addressing the challenges of our time—such as climate change, pandemics, and the threats to liberal democracies and human autonomy posed by digital technologies and choice architectures—calls for fostering capable and engaged citizens as a first line of response to complement slower, systemic approaches.

List with summary points:

1. Behavioral public policy garnered widespread attention with the introduction of nudging, which aims to steer behavior while maintaining freedom of choice.
2. Criticisms of nudging include that it does not promote agency and competences and that it relies—overly optimistically—on the presence of benevolent choice architects.
3. The proliferation of environments threatening people's autonomy, the slow pace of systemic approaches to tackling societal issues, and the intrinsic benefits of empowerment make empowering citizens an indispensable objective of behavioral public policy.
4. Boosting is a behavioral public policy approach to empowerment grounded in evidence from behavioral science that shows that humans’ boundedly rational decision making is not as flawed as the nudging approach assumes.
5. Boosts are interventions that improve people's competencies to make informed choices that conform to their goals, preferences, and desires.
6. In self-nudging boosts, people learn to use architectural changes in their proximate choice environment to regulate their own behavior—that is, they are empowered to adapt their own choice environments.
7. There are boosts to foster core competences in many domains, including finance, online environments, and health, as well as broader, overarching areas, such as motivation, risk, and judgment and decision making. Boosts should be part of a policy mix that also includes system-level approaches.
8. When implementing boosts, policy makers need to avoid the trap of individualizing responsibility and to be mindful that, due to differences in cognition and motivation, inequalities in the desirable effects across boosted individuals may emerge.

January 23, 2025 at 10:54 AM

mirjamjenny.bsky.social

@mirjamjenny.bsky.social

Wir hatten im Vorfeld noch nie so viel Andrang! Seid am 14.2. auch beim Wahlspecial der Climate Connect dabei!👇

Institute for Planetary Health Behaviour @ipb.bsky.social · Jan 23

#SaveTheDate Das Institute for Planetary Health Behaviour (IPB) lädt herzlich ein zum 𝗖𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗪𝗮𝗵𝗹𝘀𝗽𝗲𝘇𝗶𝗮𝗹, einer spannenden Diskussion über Demokratie, politische Teilhabe und wie Bürger:innen aktiv zum Klimaschutz beitragen können.🗳️ @unierfurt.bsky.social 👉 www.uni-erfurt.de/institute-fo...