Voice assistant! It can’t just be me that wants to wear one of these on my shirt - Star Trek combadge style.

The only logical answer is to focus on two things:
1. Energy innovation, get the cost of energy to trend towards zero.
2. Automation, automate as much as ‘humanoidly’ possible.
With the cost of production trending to £0, wealth inequality evaporates and we can live in a world of abundance.

Jony and Sam fall out with each other due to differing strategic objectives. The former wanting to focus on autonomous health care, the latter autonomous warfare.
Elon relocates to Mars and uses #Neuralink to maintain humanoid presence on Earth.

iBrooch makes use of iPhone tech + OpenAI tech + Vision Pro tech. It utterly decimates phone sales.
Focus shifts to humanoid robot production using iBrooch tech. Apple goes head to head with #Tesla and their #Optimus robot.

That’s where government is meant to step in, subsidising or incentivising the beneficial yet unprofitable solutions, or taxing the profitable yet suboptimal alternatives.

This still looks like a solvable problem.
The energy requirement is going to be the major limiting factor to AI for quite some time, not the capability to reason.

4. Hold a weighting of fundamental principles. When faced with a seemingly insurmountable problem, which fundamental principle should be scrutinised first.
It’s in this area that the science community often operate.

3. Know when to decrease the ‘learned accuracy’ of the pattern, increasing randomness to try and find an entirely new or optimal pattern.

2. Know when to increase the breadth of that similarity. Applying known patterns to unrelated problems, and how far to push that boundary.

Surely the difference with human reasoning is the ability to:
1. Apply known patterns to ‘broadly similar’ problems.
What weighting to apply to known patterns to optimise which to try first, and how long to keep trying.