Tricia
@migrainedinpgh.bsky.social
49, Yinzer, migraineur, angry liberal.
So you’re an elitist asshole, too?
Nobody should have ever needed to tell you sex workers are human beings and deserve to be treated as sick.
Nobody should have ever needed to tell you sex workers are human beings and deserve to be treated as sick.
August 26, 2025 at 3:00 PM
So you’re an elitist asshole, too?
Nobody should have ever needed to tell you sex workers are human beings and deserve to be treated as sick.
Nobody should have ever needed to tell you sex workers are human beings and deserve to be treated as sick.
Wait. She laughed at someone claiming they want to make the world a better place when they don’t even view some people as people.
And you think SHE is the problem. 🤣
And you think SHE is the problem. 🤣
August 26, 2025 at 2:59 PM
Wait. She laughed at someone claiming they want to make the world a better place when they don’t even view some people as people.
And you think SHE is the problem. 🤣
And you think SHE is the problem. 🤣
Your elitism sucks.
Custodial staff know so much about their schools, their students, the faculty, the other staff.
They aren’t the shit you scrape off your shoe.
Be. Better.
Custodial staff know so much about their schools, their students, the faculty, the other staff.
They aren’t the shit you scrape off your shoe.
Be. Better.
August 26, 2025 at 2:57 PM
Your elitism sucks.
Custodial staff know so much about their schools, their students, the faculty, the other staff.
They aren’t the shit you scrape off your shoe.
Be. Better.
Custodial staff know so much about their schools, their students, the faculty, the other staff.
They aren’t the shit you scrape off your shoe.
Be. Better.
The scientists will be in danger and all of the work they did to set up will be destroyed. Red voters don’t like to have their ideology challenged.
July 9, 2025 at 1:44 PM
The scientists will be in danger and all of the work they did to set up will be destroyed. Red voters don’t like to have their ideology challenged.
I’m sorry she for what she voted for. It means the rest of us did, too.
April 24, 2025 at 9:39 PM
I’m sorry she for what she voted for. It means the rest of us did, too.
My only question is why isn’t he her EX-fiancé after this?
Alone would be WAY better than with that man.
Alone would be WAY better than with that man.
January 28, 2025 at 5:03 PM
My only question is why isn’t he her EX-fiancé after this?
Alone would be WAY better than with that man.
Alone would be WAY better than with that man.
They still insist nothing happened.
January 7, 2025 at 4:02 PM
They still insist nothing happened.
And currently, the only thing that DOES matter is the Electoral College. Even if Dems wanted this, it’s not a change of any kind.
December 9, 2024 at 4:32 PM
And currently, the only thing that DOES matter is the Electoral College. Even if Dems wanted this, it’s not a change of any kind.
^out of, not our.
Autocorrect. 😡
Autocorrect. 😡
December 9, 2024 at 1:33 PM
^out of, not our.
Autocorrect. 😡
Autocorrect. 😡
Anyone who didn’t bother to vote can’t be trusted to care, to do anything, to say anything, to oppose him, or to actually NOT actually be in full support.
I mean he was POTUS once before. If they didn’t agree with his bullshit, they’d have voted to keep him our office.
I mean he was POTUS once before. If they didn’t agree with his bullshit, they’d have voted to keep him our office.
December 9, 2024 at 1:33 PM
Anyone who didn’t bother to vote can’t be trusted to care, to do anything, to say anything, to oppose him, or to actually NOT actually be in full support.
I mean he was POTUS once before. If they didn’t agree with his bullshit, they’d have voted to keep him our office.
I mean he was POTUS once before. If they didn’t agree with his bullshit, they’d have voted to keep him our office.
Compelling argument.
December 1, 2024 at 5:59 PM
Compelling argument.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Fragile man can’t handle “profanity” when he has both pretended not to understand and then INTENTIONALLY misrepresented someone else’s words so he can be patronizing.
You ave been dismissive and condescending and have offered nothing but “I disagree.”
Fragile man can’t handle “profanity” when he has both pretended not to understand and then INTENTIONALLY misrepresented someone else’s words so he can be patronizing.
You ave been dismissive and condescending and have offered nothing but “I disagree.”
December 1, 2024 at 5:52 PM
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Fragile man can’t handle “profanity” when he has both pretended not to understand and then INTENTIONALLY misrepresented someone else’s words so he can be patronizing.
You ave been dismissive and condescending and have offered nothing but “I disagree.”
Fragile man can’t handle “profanity” when he has both pretended not to understand and then INTENTIONALLY misrepresented someone else’s words so he can be patronizing.
You ave been dismissive and condescending and have offered nothing but “I disagree.”
Oh honey, it’s possible to disagree with someone without being a pompous, critical, dismissive asshole.
At least for most of us. 🤷♀️
At least for most of us. 🤷♀️
December 1, 2024 at 5:39 PM
Oh honey, it’s possible to disagree with someone without being a pompous, critical, dismissive asshole.
At least for most of us. 🤷♀️
At least for most of us. 🤷♀️
And please cite your sources.
Whose focus group? Who funded it? How many people? What demographic? What were the exact questions asked? Were the participants paid for their answers?
Whose focus group? Who funded it? How many people? What demographic? What were the exact questions asked? Were the participants paid for their answers?
December 1, 2024 at 5:30 PM
And please cite your sources.
Whose focus group? Who funded it? How many people? What demographic? What were the exact questions asked? Were the participants paid for their answers?
Whose focus group? Who funded it? How many people? What demographic? What were the exact questions asked? Were the participants paid for their answers?
Jesus Christ. If they care more about the economy than a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, then they don’t care about a woman’s right to bodily autonomy. They are okay with rape for perceived economic benefits.
They’re also not very smart because his economic policy will leave us all worse off.
They’re also not very smart because his economic policy will leave us all worse off.
December 1, 2024 at 5:29 PM
Jesus Christ. If they care more about the economy than a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, then they don’t care about a woman’s right to bodily autonomy. They are okay with rape for perceived economic benefits.
They’re also not very smart because his economic policy will leave us all worse off.
They’re also not very smart because his economic policy will leave us all worse off.
So, you’re critical of any position that doesn’t agree with yours while also offering no reason for anyone to adopt yours.
Men are announcing “Your body, my choice” but you don’t think they voted FOR the rapist? 🤣
Men are announcing “Your body, my choice” but you don’t think they voted FOR the rapist? 🤣
December 1, 2024 at 5:25 PM
So, you’re critical of any position that doesn’t agree with yours while also offering no reason for anyone to adopt yours.
Men are announcing “Your body, my choice” but you don’t think they voted FOR the rapist? 🤣
Men are announcing “Your body, my choice” but you don’t think they voted FOR the rapist? 🤣
What part of reading comprehension do you not have?
The “you” is the people who voted for him. “If you did X because of Y, but that caused Z, you are explicitly saying Z matters less to you than X.
The “you” is the people who voted for him. “If you did X because of Y, but that caused Z, you are explicitly saying Z matters less to you than X.
December 1, 2024 at 5:22 PM
What part of reading comprehension do you not have?
The “you” is the people who voted for him. “If you did X because of Y, but that caused Z, you are explicitly saying Z matters less to you than X.
The “you” is the people who voted for him. “If you did X because of Y, but that caused Z, you are explicitly saying Z matters less to you than X.
Possible, but you say it as if it’s fact. Where’s your source? Did all of the voters tell you this? 🤣
Regardless of why they say they voted to him they voted FOR HIM. If the economy is more important than preventing a racist rapist from becoming a dictator, you most be okay with racist rapists. 🤷♀️
Regardless of why they say they voted to him they voted FOR HIM. If the economy is more important than preventing a racist rapist from becoming a dictator, you most be okay with racist rapists. 🤷♀️
December 1, 2024 at 4:44 PM
Possible, but you say it as if it’s fact. Where’s your source? Did all of the voters tell you this? 🤣
Regardless of why they say they voted to him they voted FOR HIM. If the economy is more important than preventing a racist rapist from becoming a dictator, you most be okay with racist rapists. 🤷♀️
Regardless of why they say they voted to him they voted FOR HIM. If the economy is more important than preventing a racist rapist from becoming a dictator, you most be okay with racist rapists. 🤷♀️