@middleagedavid.bsky.social
Reposted
We put the pressure on ALL elected leaders. How? By the simple, and boring things that work. Call. Write. Protest. Demand records.
Many people roll their eyes at those things, as though they are futile acts. WRONG. Those are the most effective tools we have.
Many people roll their eyes at those things, as though they are futile acts. WRONG. Those are the most effective tools we have.
February 1, 2026 at 2:35 AM
We put the pressure on ALL elected leaders. How? By the simple, and boring things that work. Call. Write. Protest. Demand records.
Many people roll their eyes at those things, as though they are futile acts. WRONG. Those are the most effective tools we have.
Many people roll their eyes at those things, as though they are futile acts. WRONG. Those are the most effective tools we have.
Reposted
Seizing blank voting machines is not going to prove anything. The million dollar bills for destroying the integrity of voting machines from the owners will only prove that Dwump or his strategist are morons. If they seize the machines before the votes are counted/cert, then the elections are void.
January 31, 2026 at 6:56 AM
Seizing blank voting machines is not going to prove anything. The million dollar bills for destroying the integrity of voting machines from the owners will only prove that Dwump or his strategist are morons. If they seize the machines before the votes are counted/cert, then the elections are void.
Reposted
On the night of Dec 18, 2020, Trump was weighing two plans - to seize voting machines (Plan A), or to go with fake electors and a rush on the Capitol (Plan B). Late that night he picked, and rejected seizing voting machines. But then the Capitol attack failed him. So now he's going back to Plan A.
January 31, 2026 at 6:41 AM
On the night of Dec 18, 2020, Trump was weighing two plans - to seize voting machines (Plan A), or to go with fake electors and a rush on the Capitol (Plan B). Late that night he picked, and rejected seizing voting machines. But then the Capitol attack failed him. So now he's going back to Plan A.
Reposted
All he has to do is claim national security and then try to send DoD to seize voting machines in the next election. Esper, Cuccinelli, Rosen, and Barr aren’t there to stop him.
January 31, 2026 at 6:27 AM
All he has to do is claim national security and then try to send DoD to seize voting machines in the next election. Esper, Cuccinelli, Rosen, and Barr aren’t there to stop him.
Reposted
Jewish Space Lasers burnt the evidence..
January 31, 2026 at 6:25 AM
Jewish Space Lasers burnt the evidence..
Reposted
Haha same thing I said on the pod. Remember when Rudy told Trump that DoD couldn’t seize voting machines until
they had proof of foreign election interference and Trump tried to make Ratcliffe brief Jeffrey Clark that there was some but Ratcliffe said no an Jack Smith has texts to prove it? Hahaha
they had proof of foreign election interference and Trump tried to make Ratcliffe brief Jeffrey Clark that there was some but Ratcliffe said no an Jack Smith has texts to prove it? Hahaha
January 31, 2026 at 6:19 AM
Haha same thing I said on the pod. Remember when Rudy told Trump that DoD couldn’t seize voting machines until
they had proof of foreign election interference and Trump tried to make Ratcliffe brief Jeffrey Clark that there was some but Ratcliffe said no an Jack Smith has texts to prove it? Hahaha
they had proof of foreign election interference and Trump tried to make Ratcliffe brief Jeffrey Clark that there was some but Ratcliffe said no an Jack Smith has texts to prove it? Hahaha
Reposted
Nor can it be argued that he's *politically* rattled.
He doesn't have to run for reelection, and if he remains in office it will be because he's done so by force and further criminality rather than because he faced voters.
And there will never be 67 votes in the Senate to convict him of anything.
He doesn't have to run for reelection, and if he remains in office it will be because he's done so by force and further criminality rather than because he faced voters.
And there will never be 67 votes in the Senate to convict him of anything.
January 31, 2026 at 7:03 AM
Nor can it be argued that he's *politically* rattled.
He doesn't have to run for reelection, and if he remains in office it will be because he's done so by force and further criminality rather than because he faced voters.
And there will never be 67 votes in the Senate to convict him of anything.
He doesn't have to run for reelection, and if he remains in office it will be because he's done so by force and further criminality rather than because he faced voters.
And there will never be 67 votes in the Senate to convict him of anything.