MichaelBrosius
@michaelbrosius.bsky.social
Reposted by MichaelBrosius
In light of some of the comments, feel like I should clarify:
My point is yes this seems like a clear violation of the 13A, but who knows what SCOTUS will do these days.
Radical SCOTUS reform is obvs essential, but I was just pointing out what could be done short-term to thwart its radicalism.
My point is yes this seems like a clear violation of the 13A, but who knows what SCOTUS will do these days.
Radical SCOTUS reform is obvs essential, but I was just pointing out what could be done short-term to thwart its radicalism.
December 29, 2025 at 5:26 PM
In light of some of the comments, feel like I should clarify:
My point is yes this seems like a clear violation of the 13A, but who knows what SCOTUS will do these days.
Radical SCOTUS reform is obvs essential, but I was just pointing out what could be done short-term to thwart its radicalism.
My point is yes this seems like a clear violation of the 13A, but who knows what SCOTUS will do these days.
Radical SCOTUS reform is obvs essential, but I was just pointing out what could be done short-term to thwart its radicalism.