This is great!

I often think of this in the same way as the bitter lesson. If we ignore morphology as a solution parameter, are we just self indulgently toying with puppets while waiting for hardware engineers to put the work in.

My favourite control textbook is Seborgs process control and dynamics - I feel like those chem eng examples just make everything so much easier to follow.

You can use this feed to get only mentions bsky.app/profile/did:...

The case of the missing teaspoons doi.org/10.1136/bmj....

This also means inequity in reviewing, papers that look good are reviewed by more stringent experienced reviewers, while run of the mill papers go the way of grad students, who tend to give noncommittal reviews for fear of making wrong decisions -> ave conf score of 5, endless revise& resubmit.

The problem is that it is almost impossible to get a tenured academic to agree to review anything right now. The last paper I handled for RA-L needed 35 requests before securing 3 experienced reviewers. You can maybe get a new assistant prof. or postdoc, but grad students are still the most willing.

Thanks for getting this started!