What is the difference between those two things? Assuming what someone is vs what they could be. I read the article as saying assume anyone with a Valknut
What is the difference between those two things? Assuming what someone is vs what they could be. I read the article as saying assume anyone with a Valknut
If someone who identifies as femme says they treat all men as potent threats to their physical safety, I'm going to completely understand why and have no need to say why I'm not a threat or why not all men. They are making a (sadly) very reasonable and
If someone who identifies as femme says they treat all men as potent threats to their physical safety, I'm going to completely understand why and have no need to say why I'm not a threat or why not all men. They are making a (sadly) very reasonable and
I apologize for being long winded, and appreciate the question.
I apologize for being long winded, and appreciate the question.
As for percentage of people, that is purely anecdotal. It's just a guess based on personal experience. Don't mean to imply otherwise.
As for percentage of people, that is purely anecdotal. It's just a guess based on personal experience. Don't mean to imply otherwise.