@menos-es-mas.bsky.social
At least they called the vote-rigging claims "false" and not "contested", like the usual both-siderism from the media.
February 7, 2026 at 12:43 PM
At least they called the vote-rigging claims "false" and not "contested", like the usual both-siderism from the media.
Correct. Just in the sub-genre of rewriting and whitewashing history, there are far worse things happening as we speak.
thehill.com/homenews/sta...
thehill.com/homenews/sta...
thehill.com
February 7, 2026 at 12:27 PM
Correct. Just in the sub-genre of rewriting and whitewashing history, there are far worse things happening as we speak.
thehill.com/homenews/sta...
thehill.com/homenews/sta...
Ok, this post merits a follow.
February 7, 2026 at 4:27 AM
Ok, this post merits a follow.
He's only a Nazi if he's from the Nazi region of Germany.
If not, he's just a sparkling fascist.
If not, he's just a sparkling fascist.
February 7, 2026 at 4:03 AM
He's only a Nazi if he's from the Nazi region of Germany.
If not, he's just a sparkling fascist.
If not, he's just a sparkling fascist.
Bingo. Their first instinct is always, ALWAYS, to double down. The back pedaling only happens if they get an earful from GOP elites.
February 7, 2026 at 4:00 AM
Bingo. Their first instinct is always, ALWAYS, to double down. The back pedaling only happens if they get an earful from GOP elites.
The key phrase there was: being a racist *blatantly*.
The ideal GOP candidate would be like a Goldilocks of racism. Racist enough to effectively further systemic racial bias, but not so racist that it becomes impossible to defend them without being a laughingstock.
The ideal GOP candidate would be like a Goldilocks of racism. Racist enough to effectively further systemic racial bias, but not so racist that it becomes impossible to defend them without being a laughingstock.
February 7, 2026 at 2:41 AM
The key phrase there was: being a racist *blatantly*.
The ideal GOP candidate would be like a Goldilocks of racism. Racist enough to effectively further systemic racial bias, but not so racist that it becomes impossible to defend them without being a laughingstock.
The ideal GOP candidate would be like a Goldilocks of racism. Racist enough to effectively further systemic racial bias, but not so racist that it becomes impossible to defend them without being a laughingstock.
The key phrase there was: being a racist *blatantly*.
The ideal GOP candidate would be like a Goldilocks of racism. Racist enough to further systemic racial bias, but not so racist that it becomes impossible to defend it without being a laughingstock.
The ideal GOP candidate would be like a Goldilocks of racism. Racist enough to further systemic racial bias, but not so racist that it becomes impossible to defend it without being a laughingstock.
February 7, 2026 at 2:31 AM
The key phrase there was: being a racist *blatantly*.
The ideal GOP candidate would be like a Goldilocks of racism. Racist enough to further systemic racial bias, but not so racist that it becomes impossible to defend it without being a laughingstock.
The ideal GOP candidate would be like a Goldilocks of racism. Racist enough to further systemic racial bias, but not so racist that it becomes impossible to defend it without being a laughingstock.
Does Uncle Tom, I mean Tim, believe that praying can retroactively make it fake news?
But then again, maybe God can time travel after all. If She's everywhere, then She can travel faster than light, right? QED
But then again, maybe God can time travel after all. If She's everywhere, then She can travel faster than light, right? QED
February 7, 2026 at 2:12 AM
Does Uncle Tom, I mean Tim, believe that praying can retroactively make it fake news?
But then again, maybe God can time travel after all. If She's everywhere, then She can travel faster than light, right? QED
But then again, maybe God can time travel after all. If She's everywhere, then She can travel faster than light, right? QED
Abuser rules, and also those of mafiosi and authoritarians.
Basically, anyone who tries to gain and hold power through fear.
Basically, anyone who tries to gain and hold power through fear.
February 6, 2026 at 4:43 AM
Abuser rules, and also those of mafiosi and authoritarians.
Basically, anyone who tries to gain and hold power through fear.
Basically, anyone who tries to gain and hold power through fear.
Ha! That's the exact quote I wanted to dig up when I saw this.
The white nationalist chickens are coming home to roost, and it ain't gonna be pretty.
The white nationalist chickens are coming home to roost, and it ain't gonna be pretty.
February 6, 2026 at 4:28 AM
Ha! That's the exact quote I wanted to dig up when I saw this.
The white nationalist chickens are coming home to roost, and it ain't gonna be pretty.
The white nationalist chickens are coming home to roost, and it ain't gonna be pretty.
Oh, they very much pretend that already and don't need to wait until he's dead.
You severely underestimate their shamelessness and hypocrisy.
You severely underestimate their shamelessness and hypocrisy.
February 5, 2026 at 7:21 PM
Oh, they very much pretend that already and don't need to wait until he's dead.
You severely underestimate their shamelessness and hypocrisy.
You severely underestimate their shamelessness and hypocrisy.
And to think that he was in the JAG corps...
He is a shell of a man who sold his soul a very long time ago, and for pennies on the dollar too, for whatever little it was worth anyway.
He is a shell of a man who sold his soul a very long time ago, and for pennies on the dollar too, for whatever little it was worth anyway.
February 5, 2026 at 4:07 AM
And to think that he was in the JAG corps...
He is a shell of a man who sold his soul a very long time ago, and for pennies on the dollar too, for whatever little it was worth anyway.
He is a shell of a man who sold his soul a very long time ago, and for pennies on the dollar too, for whatever little it was worth anyway.
I feel like these folks get off on setting dumpster fires (and talking sh1t) and happen to be nerdy enough to cook up an elaborate but delusional belief system to rationalize it.
February 4, 2026 at 1:30 AM
I feel like these folks get off on setting dumpster fires (and talking sh1t) and happen to be nerdy enough to cook up an elaborate but delusional belief system to rationalize it.
You're being deliberately obtuse. Murder is a far more serious felony, yet nobody calls murderers "illegals".
An immigration violation is a civil offense, yet you think calling someone who does that an "illegal" is reasonable. Pretty sure you can see the difference, but are just playing dumb.
An immigration violation is a civil offense, yet you think calling someone who does that an "illegal" is reasonable. Pretty sure you can see the difference, but are just playing dumb.
February 3, 2026 at 5:52 PM
You're being deliberately obtuse. Murder is a far more serious felony, yet nobody calls murderers "illegals".
An immigration violation is a civil offense, yet you think calling someone who does that an "illegal" is reasonable. Pretty sure you can see the difference, but are just playing dumb.
An immigration violation is a civil offense, yet you think calling someone who does that an "illegal" is reasonable. Pretty sure you can see the difference, but are just playing dumb.
Indeed. St Ronnie used a dog whistle instead of an air horn, like speaking about welfare queens and young bucks having T-bone steaks, and launching his campaign at a place in Mississippi whose claim to fame is the murder of 3 civil rights activists.
February 3, 2026 at 11:38 AM
Indeed. St Ronnie used a dog whistle instead of an air horn, like speaking about welfare queens and young bucks having T-bone steaks, and launching his campaign at a place in Mississippi whose claim to fame is the murder of 3 civil rights activists.
Eyeliner + bronzer is a killer combo
February 3, 2026 at 11:03 AM
Eyeliner + bronzer is a killer combo
"Is that a crop circle or are you just happy to see me?"
February 3, 2026 at 10:01 AM
"Is that a crop circle or are you just happy to see me?"
The confederates harped on state/local rights as a convenient excuse to justify slavery when the then federal govt was opposed to it.
Now, the ideological heirs of Dixie are calling for the federal boot on the necks of all cities that aren't in their team. This is what a cold civil war looks like.
Now, the ideological heirs of Dixie are calling for the federal boot on the necks of all cities that aren't in their team. This is what a cold civil war looks like.
February 3, 2026 at 9:21 AM
The confederates harped on state/local rights as a convenient excuse to justify slavery when the then federal govt was opposed to it.
Now, the ideological heirs of Dixie are calling for the federal boot on the necks of all cities that aren't in their team. This is what a cold civil war looks like.
Now, the ideological heirs of Dixie are calling for the federal boot on the necks of all cities that aren't in their team. This is what a cold civil war looks like.
The confederates harped on state/local rights as a convenient excuse to justify slavery when the then federal govt was opposed to it.
Now, the ideological heirs of Dixie are calling for the federal boot on the necks of all cities that aren't in their team. This is what a cold civil war looks like.
Now, the ideological heirs of Dixie are calling for the federal boot on the necks of all cities that aren't in their team. This is what a cold civil war looks like.
February 3, 2026 at 9:20 AM
The confederates harped on state/local rights as a convenient excuse to justify slavery when the then federal govt was opposed to it.
Now, the ideological heirs of Dixie are calling for the federal boot on the necks of all cities that aren't in their team. This is what a cold civil war looks like.
Now, the ideological heirs of Dixie are calling for the federal boot on the necks of all cities that aren't in their team. This is what a cold civil war looks like.
Are you Native American?
It sounds like you're pretending that your European ancestors "settled" this already settled land, as opposed to conquering it.
With a few massacres here and there, but really, who's counting?
It sounds like you're pretending that your European ancestors "settled" this already settled land, as opposed to conquering it.
With a few massacres here and there, but really, who's counting?
February 3, 2026 at 9:12 AM
Are you Native American?
It sounds like you're pretending that your European ancestors "settled" this already settled land, as opposed to conquering it.
With a few massacres here and there, but really, who's counting?
It sounds like you're pretending that your European ancestors "settled" this already settled land, as opposed to conquering it.
With a few massacres here and there, but really, who's counting?
You're trying to be deliberately obtuse. I meant that if all types of laws a person can break, it's only this one kind where the person, not the act, is called illegal.
I'm pretty sure you can see the difference but are pretending to not get it.
I'm pretty sure you can see the difference but are pretending to not get it.
February 3, 2026 at 9:07 AM
You're trying to be deliberately obtuse. I meant that if all types of laws a person can break, it's only this one kind where the person, not the act, is called illegal.
I'm pretty sure you can see the difference but are pretending to not get it.
I'm pretty sure you can see the difference but are pretending to not get it.