Melanie
@melanietuttle.bsky.social
If someone is terminated for cause, the cause must exist, otherwise it’s termination on vibes. Process is essential to establish that cause exists. Saying that a person is being terminated because he might have done something is insufficient. Cause is required, not allegations of misconduct.
January 21, 2026 at 9:32 PM
If someone is terminated for cause, the cause must exist, otherwise it’s termination on vibes. Process is essential to establish that cause exists. Saying that a person is being terminated because he might have done something is insufficient. Cause is required, not allegations of misconduct.
So, anyone can get paid $50k to become part of ICE and then shoot whomever they want with absolute immunity. Hmmm, what a deal. I think we’ll soon be overrun with ICE agents and dead bodies.
January 8, 2026 at 10:15 PM
So, anyone can get paid $50k to become part of ICE and then shoot whomever they want with absolute immunity. Hmmm, what a deal. I think we’ll soon be overrun with ICE agents and dead bodies.
Oh, that was Robert Lansing. So, so long ago. Marco Rubio wants a do-over. Good-bye to the US Virgin Islands. Americans can now spend their winter vacations in Nuuk.
Lansing.so
January 7, 2026 at 10:12 PM
Oh, that was Robert Lansing. So, so long ago. Marco Rubio wants a do-over. Good-bye to the US Virgin Islands. Americans can now spend their winter vacations in Nuuk.
Query to an ICE agent and the DHS: “What were they doing that caused your use of force?” Response: “Breathing.”
January 7, 2026 at 9:59 PM
Query to an ICE agent and the DHS: “What were they doing that caused your use of force?” Response: “Breathing.”
What happened to states’ rights?!?
January 7, 2026 at 4:06 PM
What happened to states’ rights?!?
Just think what they could nab Putin for! Machine guns? Nah, nuclear weapons! That’s worth at least attempted battery.
January 3, 2026 at 10:51 PM
Just think what they could nab Putin for! Machine guns? Nah, nuclear weapons! That’s worth at least attempted battery.
When do we grab Putin for possession and conspiracy to possess nuclear weapons against the United States?
January 3, 2026 at 6:15 PM
When do we grab Putin for possession and conspiracy to possess nuclear weapons against the United States?
If indictments are all it takes and not where you live or who you are, then Trump should be wearing orange camouflage.
January 3, 2026 at 4:24 PM
If indictments are all it takes and not where you live or who you are, then Trump should be wearing orange camouflage.
The transparency is the failure to fully comply. The only explanation for noncompliance is that the files contain proof of misdeeds and crimes. They certainly don’t establish Trump’s innocence. Or else we would have seen them ages ago. Or, they show the guilt of someone who has something on Trump.
December 21, 2025 at 10:02 PM
The transparency is the failure to fully comply. The only explanation for noncompliance is that the files contain proof of misdeeds and crimes. They certainly don’t establish Trump’s innocence. Or else we would have seen them ages ago. Or, they show the guilt of someone who has something on Trump.
It’s kind of like a drinking game. Sip for every blackened word. You’re sipping for every mention of “Trump. “
December 18, 2025 at 11:58 PM
It’s kind of like a drinking game. Sip for every blackened word. You’re sipping for every mention of “Trump. “
Treadmills are action packed, tense and fast moving. What more do you need? Perhaps a WWDTM podcast to pass the time? That works for me.
December 16, 2025 at 10:22 PM
Treadmills are action packed, tense and fast moving. What more do you need? Perhaps a WWDTM podcast to pass the time? That works for me.
All hyperbole. Let’s translate Miller’s message: “Not everyone is on board with my uber right vision for America. Those who disagree with me are necessarily left-wing radicals and must be severely punished. My aim is to see that happen.”
October 5, 2025 at 1:06 PM
All hyperbole. Let’s translate Miller’s message: “Not everyone is on board with my uber right vision for America. Those who disagree with me are necessarily left-wing radicals and must be severely punished. My aim is to see that happen.”
He loves stereotypes. I’ve got one for him: teenage, beer drinking boy at a party with a friend and a girl in an upstairs bedroom. What happens next? Squee if you know the answer.
October 3, 2025 at 10:57 AM
He loves stereotypes. I’ve got one for him: teenage, beer drinking boy at a party with a friend and a girl in an upstairs bedroom. What happens next? Squee if you know the answer.
Clarence Thomas: “If I can get four others to agree with me, stare decisis is for suckers.”
September 30, 2025 at 1:13 AM
Clarence Thomas: “If I can get four others to agree with me, stare decisis is for suckers.”
Stare decisis means whether you are able to get four of brethren to agree to a contrary result. With today’s POTUS, it means never having your say you’re sorry.
September 30, 2025 at 1:11 AM
Stare decisis means whether you are able to get four of brethren to agree to a contrary result. With today’s POTUS, it means never having your say you’re sorry.
Another response: I don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about.
September 24, 2025 at 8:11 PM
Another response: I don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about.
Like his comment at the CK memorial service about hating people, this speech was another strong move in his campaign for the Nobel Peace Prize.
September 24, 2025 at 8:23 AM
Like his comment at the CK memorial service about hating people, this speech was another strong move in his campaign for the Nobel Peace Prize.
But Matthew Dowd uttered something that was not politically correct and we all know how important political correctness is to the conservative movement. Oops, wait, that’s not right. I guess it’s not a two-way street.
September 13, 2025 at 8:01 AM
But Matthew Dowd uttered something that was not politically correct and we all know how important political correctness is to the conservative movement. Oops, wait, that’s not right. I guess it’s not a two-way street.
It would be nice if she were to apply the same principle to the Epstein files if and when presented with the question.
September 13, 2025 at 7:54 AM
It would be nice if she were to apply the same principle to the Epstein files if and when presented with the question.
If only he would put as much credence in the common perceptions of what occurs when beer drinking teenage boys at a party find themselves in an upstairs bedroom with a girl.
September 13, 2025 at 7:51 AM
If only he would put as much credence in the common perceptions of what occurs when beer drinking teenage boys at a party find themselves in an upstairs bedroom with a girl.
And not once was Epstein mentioned. Hence, a win for Trump.
August 16, 2025 at 4:36 PM
And not once was Epstein mentioned. Hence, a win for Trump.