Mejoff
banner
mejoff-things.bsky.social
Mejoff
@mejoff-things.bsky.social
Pan Poly LARPer Gamer Leftie Boulderer Miniature-painter occasional Author and Game-designer ADHD Cat-dad
It finds out what your name would have been and uses that.
December 1, 2025 at 9:44 AM
Constantly, even if you're cis.
December 1, 2025 at 9:43 AM
I assume USS Make Shit Up by Voltaire is considered cheating?
December 1, 2025 at 8:21 AM
Of course it won't.
November 30, 2025 at 10:48 PM
Was delightful to bump into you.
November 30, 2025 at 10:46 PM
Oop, someone got called out on some bigotry or other unpleasantness and didn't like what they were told!
November 30, 2025 at 5:55 PM
The problem is, a bunchbof these companies just got caught lying about their accounts and had basically no consequences for it. They also lie about the technology itself, a lot. Alsonthe data centres are mostly not in the UK, so enforcing any kind of monitoring or taxation from HMRC won't work.
November 30, 2025 at 5:13 PM
Look it's very clear you have no idea how the internet, the tech industry qnd lobby work. And that's fine. This is too short a form to fix that today. Have fun. Bye.
November 30, 2025 at 1:01 PM
Are bad faith non sequiturs enforceable?
November 30, 2025 at 12:49 PM
Radiation damage.
November 30, 2025 at 10:30 AM
Yes, and I entirely reject your premise that it is enforceable at all. Perfect/not perfect is not the question, and is utterly meaningless in the context of complete non-existence.
November 30, 2025 at 8:37 AM
Yeah, I can see that. I disagree with your premise that it will be enforceable but not perfectly. I maintain that it would not be enforceable at all. Perfect or not perfect is meaningless in the context of entirely non existent or ineffectual.
November 29, 2025 at 11:20 PM
What? Gamers losing their shit over a woman existing?

Sadly yes.
November 29, 2025 at 10:30 PM
I like that they dragged a wedge of the left out of Labour and then left them without a party just as Polanski hit his stride, they've been incredibly effective for the Greens.
November 29, 2025 at 10:29 PM
The criterion was "enforceable".
November 29, 2025 at 10:23 PM
Given the number of covers that are just some bloke's face, i think that is the entire problem OP has with it.
November 29, 2025 at 10:22 PM
I'll give you a hint, especially if you manage to do an online search without AI forcing itself on you: include the letters V, P and N in your search term.
November 29, 2025 at 9:40 PM
Oi @bsky.app we need a laughing react.

That is absolutely not how the tech industry's relationship with government works. Also, that's not how technology works. Look up how effective the porn ban has been. I
November 29, 2025 at 9:40 PM
How?
November 29, 2025 at 9:18 PM
So much for the "warrior ethos"! In my day if you wanted the military to murder a bunch if innocent civilians in a boat (and out of it), you'd strafe them from a fighter jet like a real man.
November 29, 2025 at 6:34 PM
Pick short books.
November 29, 2025 at 5:16 PM
Unenforceable, sadly. And I'm pretty sure ensuring it would be was one of the motivations behind shoehorning it into the fundamental runtime of as many commonly used things as possible as quickly as possible.
November 29, 2025 at 5:02 PM
No. Polanski's advantage is he's very good at factional far left bullshit and managed to get the Greens' top echelons purged of their problem figures as he took the reins.
November 29, 2025 at 3:34 PM
If they weren't woke snowflakes they'd just risk death for mediocre Italian food.
November 29, 2025 at 2:28 PM