LightNews LightNews
meclou.bsky.social
@meclou.bsky.social
26 followers 47 following 0 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted
nhervieu.bsky.social
Intelligence artificielle : Une juge britannique fustige les « graves conséquences » pour la justice « en cas de mauvaise utilisation de l’IA ».

Dans deux affaires, de fausses jurisprudences ont été générées par l'IA (via une élève-avocate & un client)

Puis citées en justice 🙃

=> bit.ly/3Httipi
Those who use artificial intelligence to conduct legal research notwithstanding these risks have a professional duty therefore to check the accuracy of such research by reference to authoritative sources, before using it in the course of their professional work (to advise clients or before a court, for example). Authoritative sources include the Government's database of legislation, the National Archives database of court judgments, the official Law Reports published by the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales and the databases of reputable legal publishers. This duty rests on lawyers who use artificial intelligence to conduct research themselves or rely on the work of others who have done so. This is no different from the responsibility of a lawyer who relies on the work of a trainee solicitor or a pupil barrister for example, or on information obtained from an internet search. We would go further however. There are serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system if artificial intelligence is misused. In those circumstances, practical and effective measures must now be taken by those within the legal profession with individual leadership responsibilities (such as heads of chambers and managing partners) and by those with the responsibility for regulating the provision of legal services. Those measures must ensure that every individual currently providing legal services within this jurisdiction (whenever and wherever they were qualified to do so) understands and complies with their professional and ethical obligations and their duties to the court if using artificial intelligence. For the future, in Hamid hearings such as these, the profession can expect the court to inquire whether those leadership responsibilities have been fulfilled.
June 6, 2025 at 12:55 PM