it would also abrogate the first two sections of Marbury, as there is likely no difference between refusing to seat an officer and removing them. Unconscionably broad QP

Section 5, Clause 4 is too broad. Requiring ALL DOJ attorneys to be appointed by AG, rather than hired, is a breeding ground for corruption

This is incorrect. The SCOTUS decision said these cases can only come from Habeas claims. The petitioners here are filling class action Habeas, which the Court has not blocked and would protect even others not named that are part of the class

As many have rightly argued, the 4th should not defer to executive judgments. Just so, attempts to circumvent habeas should not either

But neither directly targeted the executive. Both inherited the background of political backlash that restrained the executive to fiercely limited powers and entrusted judicial oversight in the margins

All this to say that the Constitution was meant to embody the inherent indignity of absolute governmental power over the person. Free Kilmar Abrego Garcia

Courts’ obsession with exec power has obfuscated that Constitutionally, Article I’s habeas suspension clause is a dualistic limit—Congressional authorization of overbroad executive discretion—just as with the 4th amendment. What then gives the exec *unique* deference on foreign affairs issues?

this all leads toll a more fundamental issue: who said the executive has such authority over foreign affairs. Was Youngstown not in the zone of twilight? Does Article I and II not delegate foreign affairs and treaty power to Congress?

it made me notice that the American left is so accustomed to police violence that it has given up on *succeeding to be safe* and has capitulated to violent/peaceful dichotomy in its own way --- if there is no violence, it's useless lib shit

that’s Howell’s normal oral argument style. Her expressing obvious incredulity makes most attorneys go “oh no wait I didn’t mean that.” The current admin is full of attorneys who are high on their own supply, so they dig in instead of seeing the obvious & so it looks like Howell is unprepared

Just look at how we view hoodies. On Mark Zuckerberg, the hoodie is a symbol of whiz kid meritocracy breaking norms and developing the New Economy. On people like Trayvon Martin, the hoodie is sometimes seen as proof of criminality. Again, it's about the bodies beneath the clothes.