mcwren.bsky.social
mcwren.bsky.social
mcwren.bsky.social
@mcwren.bsky.social
"Nazi collaboration was good as long as you weren't the first. I'm the most intelligent Stalinist." - you
August 31, 2025 at 12:39 AM
Is Jeffrey Herf the only source on the Wikipedia page? Or are you zeroing in on one in a dishonest attempt to discredit the whole. Herf isn't even the sole source of that quote. If you carefully look next to 66, you will see another number.
August 31, 2025 at 12:35 AM
You can't offer a coherent defense of your favorite fascist collaborator
August 31, 2025 at 12:33 AM
His actions over that time included shipping a massive amount of material to the Nazis so they could bypass the British blockade, a joint invasion of Poland, multiple meetings between the Gestapo and NKVD on POW exchange and mass murder, restricting criticism of Germany in the USSR, and more
August 31, 2025 at 12:30 AM
When did Stalin decide that he had collaborated with the fascists enough, it was time to fight them? Was he visited by three anti-fascist ghosts on the night of June 21st, 1941?
August 31, 2025 at 12:12 AM
Buddy, your puerile attempts at humor aren't going to distract me from the fact that you recently admitted that you believe collaborating with fascists to be based.
August 31, 2025 at 12:07 AM
Look at the source for 98, which is where both quoted sections cite as I said. Is that Albert Resis?
August 31, 2025 at 12:04 AM
The word trade agreement is dishonest when referring to the totality of support Stalin offered Hitler from 1939-1941.
August 31, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Collaborating with fascists is never necessary/based. Sorry that doesn't match your evil and reprehensible red-brown worldview.
August 30, 2025 at 11:43 PM
I'm talking about the Stalin quote, not the Sokolov quote. That's why I referred to him as the "Nazi collaborator" and not the "climate change denier".
August 30, 2025 at 11:41 PM
The quotes come from Albert Resis, "The Fall of Litvinov: Harbinger of the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact". What are your sources again? It's the same easily disproven drivel red-brown bootlickers have been pushing for ~75 years.
August 30, 2025 at 11:36 PM
A timeline where Stalin collaborated with the Nazis from 1939-1941 and then only reluctantly began to fight them after they had betrayed him, the one you live in but refuse to acknowledge.
August 30, 2025 at 11:31 PM
Hitler being an imbecile isn't proof of Soviet preparation. If they were sufficiently prepared, how did the Nazis end sieging Moscow? Why wait 6 months to begin fighting back?
August 30, 2025 at 11:30 PM
Why do you keep repeating obvious lies and mistruths cooked up by Stalin long after the war to try and excuse his reprehensible actions from 1939-1941?
August 30, 2025 at 11:20 PM
Why do you dismiss the quote from Stalin? Is it because he's a Nazi collaborator? Most likely not, you seem to think that collaborating with Nazis is all fine and good as long as you get something in return.
August 30, 2025 at 11:16 PM
The trade agreements did not prepare them for a war they won. The Soviets supplied the German war machine and then were crushed by it. The arms they received in return did not allow them to defend themselves. It was Lend-Lease that turned the tide and allowed them to begin to fight back.
August 30, 2025 at 11:03 PM
You don't consider the millions of unprepared Red Army soldiers who died after the Nazis predictably betrayed them to be a loss? I would have rather they had a competent non-fascist collaborating leader.
August 30, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Or what about this order from Stalin? Do you think this was good and sound policy by Stalin and Molotov?
August 30, 2025 at 10:56 PM
Demanding he resign against his protestations, then arresting and beating his aides, sure sounds like a firing to me.
August 30, 2025 at 10:49 PM
Did the USSR end up getting fcked in their deal with the Nazis?
August 30, 2025 at 10:46 PM
Yes, he did.
August 30, 2025 at 10:45 PM