Marya
LightNews LightNews
banner
mck77.bsky.social
Marya
@mck77.bsky.social
45 followers 14 following 8 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by Marya
georgetakei.bsky.social
Trump wants to get rid of mail-in ballots so he can intimidate voters with federal troops stationed at the polling stations.

Hard to scare people who can just quietly mail in their votes.

Protect mail-in voting at all cost.
August 20, 2025 at 10:44 PM
mck77.bsky.social
www.facebook.com/RBReich/vide...
166K reactions · 98K shares | Why is Trump so hell-bent on defunding PBS? It’s part of a larger plan — one where he can control not just what we do, but what we think. Watch: | Robert Reich
Why is Trump so hell-bent on defunding PBS? It’s part of a larger plan — one where he can control not just what we do, but what we think. Watch:.
www.facebook.com
July 18, 2025 at 9:26 PM
Reposted by Marya
supportdemocracy.bsky.social
Why, for the first time, do I not feel in a celebratory mood today?
July 4, 2025 at 1:17 PM
Reposted by Marya
jaimehylton.bsky.social
June 11, 2025 at 11:59 AM
Reposted by Marya
corgwynmom.bsky.social
Awww….(world’s smallest violin playing)
Tesla confirms it can't sell the Cybertruck even with tax credit and discounts
Tesla has revealed Cybertruck deliveries in the US, confirming that it can’t sell the electric truck even with federal tax...
electrek.co
March 20, 2025 at 10:13 PM
Reposted by Marya
mwmarshall.bsky.social
March 21, 2025 at 2:33 AM
mck77.bsky.social
Will getting rid of the Department of Education help people IMPROVE spelling?
March 21, 2025 at 4:53 PM
Reposted by Marya
blue2354.bsky.social
🎯
March 19, 2025 at 1:33 AM
Reposted by Marya
corgwynmom.bsky.social
March 18, 2025 at 2:14 AM
Reposted by Marya
corgwynmom.bsky.social
March 14, 2025 at 6:46 PM
mck77.bsky.social
March 15, 2025 at 1:58 AM
Reposted by Marya
annettebeebe.bsky.social
Exactly
March 11, 2025 at 11:50 AM
Reposted by Marya
krassenstein.bsky.social
March 10, 2025 at 8:03 PM
Reposted by Marya
georgetakei.bsky.social
See the diff?
A billboard in a desert landscape features a large image of Donald Trump wearing a suit and red tie. To the right of his image, text in bold capital letters reads: "TRUMP IS GOLFING. VANCE IS SKIING. ZELENSKY IS FIGHTING FOR HIS COUNTRY." The tweet is posted by a user named Fernando Oliver, Esq.
March 11, 2025 at 2:30 PM
Reposted by Marya
krassenstein.bsky.social
March 11, 2025 at 12:24 AM
mck77.bsky.social
Hearing Musk’s X got cyber hacked was the best news of the day
March 11, 2025 at 2:58 AM
Reposted by Marya
rickylongthread.bsky.social
March 8, 2025 at 7:27 PM
Reposted by Marya
corgwynmom.bsky.social
March 8, 2025 at 4:27 AM
mck77.bsky.social
Today we celebrate International Women’s Day. Let’s celebrate women worldwide every day by giving us equality to make our own choices over our own bodies ,education and who we vote to lead us.
March 8, 2025 at 4:57 PM
Reposted by Marya
mjfree.bsky.social
I'm going to post this video every day so we never forget what Trump did on J6
March 6, 2025 at 12:36 PM
Reposted by Marya
fritschner.bsky.social
The White House just sent out this memorandum signed by Trump directing departments and agencies to try to deter plaintiffs from bringing lawsuits against the Executive Branch, in response to "sweeping injunctions" sought by "activist organizations"
MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES Subject: Ensuring the Enforcement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c) In recent weeks, activist organizations fueled by hundreds of millions of dollars in donations and sometimes even Government grants have obtained sweeping injunctions far beyond the scope of relief contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, functionally inserting themselves into the executive policy making process and therefore undermining the democratic process. This anti-democratic takeover is orchestrated by forum-shopping organizations that repeatedly bring meritless suits, used for fundraising and political grandstanding, without any repercussions when they fail. Taxpayers are forced not only to cover the costs of their antics when funding and hiring decisions are enjoined, but must needlessly wait for Government policies they voted for. Moreover, this situation results in the Department of Justice, the Nation's chief law enforcement agency, dedicating substantial resources to fighting frivolous suits instead of defending public safety. The effective administration of justice in the Federal courts depends on mechanisms that deter frivolous litigation, protect parties from unwarranted costs, and streamline judicial processes. One key mechanism is Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c) (Rule 65(c)), which mandates that a party seeking a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order (injunction) provide security in an amount that the court considers proper to cover potential costs and damages to the enjoined or restrained party if the injunction is wrongly issued. Consistent enforcement of this rule is critical to ensuring that taxpayers do not foot the bill for costs or damages caused by wrongly issued preliminary relief by activist judges and to achieving the effective administration of justice. Therefore, it is the policy of the United States to demand that parties seeking injunctions against the Federal Government must cover the costs and damages incurred if the Government is ultimately found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained. Federal courts should hold litigants accountable for their misrepresentations and ill-granted injunctions. Consistent with applicable law, the heads of executive departments and agencies (agencies), in consultation with the Attorney General, are directed to ensure that their respective agencies properly request under Rule 65(c) that Federal district courts require plaintiffs to post security equal to the Federal Government's potential costs and damages from a wrongly issued injunction. The scope of this directive covers all lawsuits filed against the Federal Government seeking an injunction where agencies can show expected monetary damages or costs from the requested preliminary relief, unless extraordinary circumstances justify an exception. In requests for security under Rule 65(c), agencies shall include, among other things, that: (a) Rule 65(c) mandates the court to require, in all applicable cases, that a movant for an injunction post security in an amount that the court considers proper to cover potential costs and damages to the enjoined or restrained party; (b) the security amount the agency is requesting is based on a reasoned assessment of the potential harm to the enjoined or restrained party; and (c) failure of the party that moved for preliminary relief to comply with Rule 65(c) results in denial or dissolution of the requested injunctive relief. This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
March 6, 2025 at 9:48 PM
Reposted by Marya
mjfree.bsky.social
March 7, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Reposted by Marya
boxerdogdad.bsky.social
Just a reminder…
#Ftrump #Fmaga
TO ANNOUNCE THAT THERE MUST BE NO CRITICISM OF THE PRESIDENT, OR THAT WE ARE TO STAND BY THE PRESIDENT, RIGHT OR WRONG, IS NOT ONLY UNPATRIOTIC AND SERVILE, BUT IS MORALLY TREASONABLE TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC. PRESIDENT ~ THEODORE ROOSEVELT
March 7, 2025 at 4:31 PM
Reposted by Marya
pino-fotus.bsky.social
March 6, 2025 at 10:12 PM