Moritz Bondeli
@mbondeli.bsky.social
PostDoc @ Humboldt Universität zu Berlin
Ph.D. in Political Science, Yale University
Harry Frank Guggenheim Emerging Scholar, 2024-25
mbondeli.github.io
Berlin, Germany | from Bern, Switzerland
Ph.D. in Political Science, Yale University
Harry Frank Guggenheim Emerging Scholar, 2024-25
mbondeli.github.io
Berlin, Germany | from Bern, Switzerland
Congratulations, Reto!
October 15, 2025 at 8:44 AM
Congratulations, Reto!
I worry this is too small a reform to pay electoral dividends, yet important enough to negatively affect the lives of (potential) immigrants. Lose-lose, in other words.
But I am glad you are more optimistic!
But I am glad you are more optimistic!
October 10, 2025 at 2:27 PM
I worry this is too small a reform to pay electoral dividends, yet important enough to negatively affect the lives of (potential) immigrants. Lose-lose, in other words.
But I am glad you are more optimistic!
But I am glad you are more optimistic!
There is also "On the reliability of published findings using the regression discontinuity design in political science" by Stommes, Aronow and Sävje on RD: doi.org/10.1177/2053...
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
doi.org
July 23, 2025 at 8:01 AM
There is also "On the reliability of published findings using the regression discontinuity design in political science" by Stommes, Aronow and Sävje on RD: doi.org/10.1177/2053...
They are my favorite thing about surveys! Excellent for quality control and really insightful
July 6, 2025 at 12:33 PM
They are my favorite thing about surveys! Excellent for quality control and really insightful
Which strikes me as important. The issue is not that the court was on board with the power grab. It is that courts are slow to check abuses of emergency powers.
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preu%C3...
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preu%C3...
Preußen contra Reich – Wikipedia
de.wikipedia.org
June 10, 2025 at 9:58 PM
Which strikes me as important. The issue is not that the court was on board with the power grab. It is that courts are slow to check abuses of emergency powers.
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preu%C3...
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preu%C3...
The federal government did not win Preussen contra Reich -- important parts of the emergency decree and emergency actions (like the purge of the Prussian bureaucracy) were found unconstitutional.
The key point is that the court only ruled when the facts on the ground were irreversible.
The key point is that the court only ruled when the facts on the ground were irreversible.
June 10, 2025 at 9:58 PM
The federal government did not win Preussen contra Reich -- important parts of the emergency decree and emergency actions (like the purge of the Prussian bureaucracy) were found unconstitutional.
The key point is that the court only ruled when the facts on the ground were irreversible.
The key point is that the court only ruled when the facts on the ground were irreversible.
Congratulations, Amanda! Fantastic news! 🎉
March 11, 2025 at 7:55 PM
Congratulations, Amanda! Fantastic news! 🎉
Don't think people will want to become pawns in every garden-variety international dispute
www.ft.com/content/4461...
www.ft.com/content/4461...
Donald Trump threatens to double tax rates for foreign nationals and companies
President orders officials to draw up retaliatory measures against ‘extraterritorial’ taxes
www.ft.com
January 22, 2025 at 12:28 AM
Don't think people will want to become pawns in every garden-variety international dispute
www.ft.com/content/4461...
www.ft.com/content/4461...