It really says a lot about us as a society that we've decided the solution to people being unhoused is somehow "no one gets to sit down, ever."

Me: Oh my god is this another LLM?
Personify Health, ripping off mask: Oh my GOSH how do you keep finding me??????

Cigna: please complete our health assessment
Me: oh great another stupid service
Cigna: access it here
Me: why...why does it want me to log in to another service
Cigna: it's just our health partner, Personify Health!
Me: what...what does that do
Cigna: ohhhhhhh... helps you advocate for your needs

Hey my guy, do me two favours before you have your "AI" "solve crime" or whatever:
1) Define "crime;"
2) Tell me the moral of the television series Person Of Interest.

Special sections should run around 6,000–15,000 words total; guest editors may divide that word count among 3–10 authors.

Send proposals or queries to Melinda Baldwin (mbaldwin@umd.edu) and Dominik Huenniger (Dominik.Huenniger@glasgow.ac.uk).

We are also interested in proposals for guest-edited special sections of short essays focused around a topic relevant to practitioners in the history of science. Past themes have included “Dilemmas of Archival Objectivity,” “How to Be an Expert,” and “Pedagogy in the History of Science.”

Standalone pieces for this section are generally 2,000–3,000 words long, though we are happy to hear a pitch for something shorter or longer if the topic requires it.

In short, we seek proposals for essays and reviews written by—and of interest to—scholars of science studies broadly defined. If one of the categories above speaks to you, or if you have another idea entirely, please get in touch to discuss your idea!

3) Reviews of historical work in other formats, such as digital resources, podcasts, museum exhibitions, and special issues of scholarly journals;
4) Essays that reflect upon current events or theoretical issues relevant to a broad range of historians of science.

Pieces we are interested in include, but are not limited to:
1) A traditional HSNS multi-book review that compares 3–4 books on a related topic;
2) An in-depth review of one book;