TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻
LightNews LightNews
banner
maytree1.bsky.social
TMaibaum #FBPE #FBSI🇪🇺🇩🇪🇵🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🌹🌻
@maytree1.bsky.social
260 followers 560 following 210 posts
🏳️‍🌈to piss off homophobes; 🇺🇦to piss off #Putinversteher​s.
Uncommented retweets *are* endorsements; views my employer's (self-employed). Pronouns: I/me.
Twitter aka 𝕏: https://x.com/maytree1
Posts Replies Media Videos
maytree1.bsky.social
Ich bin froh, dass ich höchstens mal Tetris spiele – oder „Thru the Wall“ auf einem ZX-Spectrum-Emulator. Da fiel mir der Abschied von Windows wesentlich leichter.

2/2
Screenshot of „Thru the Wall“
October 31, 2025 at 8:34 AM
maytree1.bsky.social
Was ich die wenigsten wissen: Das weitgehend als schlicht gegebene Geschäftsmodell der Verlage wurde erst in den 50er Jahren von niemand geringerem als Robert Maxwell (heute evtl. bekannter als Vater von Ghislaine Maxwell) erfunden und als Standard etabliert.
www.theguardian.com/science/2017...
"The way to make money from a scientific article looks very similar, except that scientific publishers manage to duck most of the actual costs. Scientists create work under their own direction – funded largely by governments – and give it to publishers for free; the publisher pays scientific editors who judge whether the work is worth publishing and check its grammar, but the bulk of the editorial burden – checking the scientific validity and evaluating the experiments, a process known as peer review – is done by working scientists on a volunteer basis. The publishers then sell the product back to government-funded institutional and university libraries, to be read by scientists – who, in a collective sense, created the product in the first place. It is as if the New Yorker or the Economist demanded that journalists write and edit each other’s work for free, and asked the government to foot the bill. Outside observers tend to fall into a sort of stunned disbelief when describing this setup. A 2004 parliamentary science and technology committee report on the industry drily observed that “in a traditional market suppliers are paid for the goods they provide”. A 2005 Deutsche Bank report referred to it as a “bizarre” “triple-pay” system, in which “the state funds most research, pays the salaries of most of those checking the quality of research, and then buys most of the published product”." "Even scientists who are fighting for reform are often not aware of the roots of the system: how, in the boom years after the second world war, entrepreneurs built fortunes by taking publishing out of the hands of scientists and expanding the business on a previously unimaginable scale. And no one was more transformative and ingenious than Robert Maxwell, who turned scientific journals into a spectacular money-making machine that bankrolled his rise in British society. Maxwell would go on to become an MP, a press baron who challenged Rupert Murdoch, and one of the most notorious figures in British life. But his true importance was far larger than most of us realise. Improbable as it might sound, few people in the last century have done more to shape the way science is conducted today than Maxwell."
September 12, 2025 at 5:28 PM
maytree1.bsky.social
Sample:
An Accessibility Relation Based On The Point Of Conception To “whittle down” the set of possible worlds to deliver one that meets Heying’s intuition, we would need to define an accessibility relation that connects only possible worlds in which an individual can (possibly) produce only one gamete type. A seemingly reasonable way to approach this would be to define accessibility as being limited to the set of worlds in which an individual has the same genome, taking the existence of an individual to begin at the point of conception, and so considering only possible life histories post-conception.⁶ But this can’t work for Heying’s purposes either. Some individuals who don’t produce gametes simply won’t produce them in any such accessible possible world: no matter how many times you rewind a life history to an earlier point in life and “replay the tape”, you can only average out chance developmental fluctuations.
September 4, 2025 at 7:15 PM
maytree1.bsky.social
This is neither a biologist nor a woman.
"Kim" Hipwell's profile picture on Medium
September 4, 2025 at 7:10 PM
maytree1.bsky.social
I think it's amazing how misled people keep quoting that article after the author herself has clarified that it was, to say the least, misleading.
It's even more amazing that the article wasn't retracted or at least fundamentally revised to avoid further any confusion.
Screenshot of clarification by author Claire Ainsworth that she doesn't claim there are more than two sexes.
November 18, 2024 at 9:12 AM
maytree1.bsky.social
Was mich wundert: Alle Welt empört sich über Musk und die Posts, die er auf X zulässt, und fordert auf, deswegen X zu verlassen oder zu boykottieren. Klar, kann man machen. Aber wer regt sich eigentlich über die dubiose Werbung auf, die Alphabet (Google) auf YouTube zulässt?
Screenshot von Werbung auf YouTube. Text: „Musk: „Soros hasst Menschheit“ Musk wird mittels X (ehemals Twitter) Soros NGOs verklagen Gesponsert Epoch Times Deutsch“
December 1, 2023 at 1:15 PM
maytree1.bsky.social
Danke für den Hinweis, das war vor meiner aktiven Zeit auf Twitter. Der Tonfall wirkt (zurückhaltend gesagt) unangenehm empathielos, aber dass Behinderte „nicht die gleichen Rechte“ wie Nicht-Behinderte haben sollten, entnehme ich dem nicht.

1/
"Miriam Vollmer @miriam_vollmer Sie hätten als Erstklässler ihren schlagenden, spuckenden und stinkenden Zwangsnachbarn, der nicht lesen konnte, natürlich geliebt. 1:58 nachm. 30. Mai 2017 1 Deine Antwort posten Antworten Miriam Vollmer @miriam_vollmer • 30. Mai 2017 Ich bin bis heute davon überzeugt, dass es falsch ist, Kinder als Hilfslehrer für verhsltensgestörte Mitschüler einzusetzen."
November 14, 2023 at 10:11 AM
maytree1.bsky.social
Sehr interessant!

de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_t...
de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_(...
"Felix, a Pat Sullivan Cartoon"
November 13, 2023 at 6:48 PM
maytree1.bsky.social
Vielmehr geht es darum, was mit Menschen geschehen soll, die wg. der obigen Schutzgründe bzw. Abschiebeverbote keinen Rechtsanspruch auf Aufenthalt haben. Das sind zwar viel mehr, als Rechtskonservative es gerne hätten (2022 über 72% der inhaltlichen entschiedenen Fälle), aber eben nicht 100%.

3/
Tortendiagramm mit den Anteilen der Ergebnisse von inhaltlichen Schutzantragsprüfungen durch das BAMF im Jahr 2022. Asylanspruch 0,8%, Flüchtlingsstatus gem. GFK 17%, subsidiärer Schutz 25,2%, Abschiebeverbot 21,6%, Ablehnung 21,6%, formelle Entscheidung 22,3%. Quelle: https://www.nds-fluerat.org/themen/fakten/deutschland-asyl-in-zahlen-2022-2023/
November 1, 2023 at 8:59 AM