Article from @wired.com

www.wired.com/story/a-simp...

Source:

github.com/sbaresearch/...

The table of figures published by the researchers

All of this can be extracted into a gigantic database and consolidated with facial recognition tools.

May I meet you?

Sounds like you post this everydays

Shit… yeah, I hope he's okay!

It's been almost a year that @justinbwatson.bsky.social disappeared … and told us this

As a reminder, Trump brought the state into Intel's capital to the tune of 10% this summer. It should also be noted that this could not be done anywhere other than the United States, as European companies are not sufficiently capitalized to provide a sufficiently high return to citizens.

6/6

I admit that the proposal is surprising in a country historically averse to any form of state interventionism, but I think Khosla is asking the right question: how can wealth be redistributed in a world where value is produced by machines?

5/6

To avoid social division and a potential revolution, a small portion of this capital would need to be “socialized,” without nationalizing companies.

4/6

His reasoning is based on the principle that if AI makes the economy massively productive but eliminates a large number of jobs, then capital will become the main source of income at the expense of labor (which is already starting to happen...).

www.youtube.com/watch?v=epQs...

3/6

(I didn't say I was in favor of it, so take it easy).

He suggests that the US government take a 10% stake in all publicly traded companies to redistribute the wealth generated by AI via dividends.

2/6

Well well well... sounds to be interesting to learn more about this!

www.humanoidsdaily.com/feed/wanderc...