Mauricio M. M.
@mauriciomm7.bsky.social
PhD Fellow at @unioslo-arena.bsky.social
• Judicial Politics • EU RoL • Data Science • Political Methodology
Formerly at @unileiden.bsky.social & TEC de Monterrey. Data Savvy👨💻
• Judicial Politics • EU RoL • Data Science • Political Methodology
Formerly at @unileiden.bsky.social & TEC de Monterrey. Data Savvy👨💻
𝐀𝐝𝐝-𝐎𝐧 𝐍𝐨.𝟐 I also built a Python package that harmonizes CELEX numbers and European Legal Identifiers (ELIs) - resolving structural inconsistencies that made precise citation analysis nearly impossible. Hoping to improve EU legal research 🐍 (more coming)
September 11, 2025 at 12:57 PM
𝐀𝐝𝐝-𝐎𝐧 𝐍𝐨.𝟐 I also built a Python package that harmonizes CELEX numbers and European Legal Identifiers (ELIs) - resolving structural inconsistencies that made precise citation analysis nearly impossible. Hoping to improve EU legal research 🐍 (more coming)
𝐀𝐝𝐝-𝐎𝐧 𝐍𝐨.𝟏 Developed a novel citation-alignment measure (LIAC) to capture court responsiveness precisely. Could be useful for anyone comparing legal reasoning between judicial actors 📊 (more coming)
September 11, 2025 at 12:57 PM
𝐀𝐝𝐝-𝐎𝐧 𝐍𝐨.𝟏 Developed a novel citation-alignment measure (LIAC) to capture court responsiveness precisely. Could be useful for anyone comparing legal reasoning between judicial actors 📊 (more coming)
This suggests informal influence through sophisticated legal reasoning > formal institutional leverage. May require reframing how power operates in multi-level systems and how judges use legal argumentation to navigate political pressures.
September 11, 2025 at 12:57 PM
This suggests informal influence through sophisticated legal reasoning > formal institutional leverage. May require reframing how power operates in multi-level systems and how judges use legal argumentation to navigate political pressures.
Two core findings:
• 1) Contra theory, EU member states influence courts MORE when they lack formal override power - ECJ responds more to legal arguments (-0.174) than credible threats (+0.048).
• 2) Referring court hierarchy fundamentally shapes ECJ behavior - it’s not just background noise.
• 1) Contra theory, EU member states influence courts MORE when they lack formal override power - ECJ responds more to legal arguments (-0.174) than credible threats (+0.048).
• 2) Referring court hierarchy fundamentally shapes ECJ behavior - it’s not just background noise.
September 11, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Two core findings:
• 1) Contra theory, EU member states influence courts MORE when they lack formal override power - ECJ responds more to legal arguments (-0.174) than credible threats (+0.048).
• 2) Referring court hierarchy fundamentally shapes ECJ behavior - it’s not just background noise.
• 1) Contra theory, EU member states influence courts MORE when they lack formal override power - ECJ responds more to legal arguments (-0.174) than credible threats (+0.048).
• 2) Referring court hierarchy fundamentally shapes ECJ behavior - it’s not just background noise.
Happy to be at my first APSA in Vancouver, BC, Canada.
I’ll be presenting "The Apex Court’s Dilemma: Rulemaking Alignment Under Hierarchical and Political Constraints" 🧵
I’ll be presenting "The Apex Court’s Dilemma: Rulemaking Alignment Under Hierarchical and Political Constraints" 🧵
September 11, 2025 at 12:57 PM
Happy to be at my first APSA in Vancouver, BC, Canada.
I’ll be presenting "The Apex Court’s Dilemma: Rulemaking Alignment Under Hierarchical and Political Constraints" 🧵
I’ll be presenting "The Apex Court’s Dilemma: Rulemaking Alignment Under Hierarchical and Political Constraints" 🧵
Today I realized that in the pursuit of genuine scientific inquiry, one does not accumulate facts, but rather maps the contours of knowledge itself —what is knowable and what is not with our current tools. A kind of epistemic cartography, tracing the topology of truth as it stands at present.
September 8, 2025 at 7:15 PM
Today I realized that in the pursuit of genuine scientific inquiry, one does not accumulate facts, but rather maps the contours of knowledge itself —what is knowable and what is not with our current tools. A kind of epistemic cartography, tracing the topology of truth as it stands at present.