Matt
@mattyeg.bsky.social
Just a tender moment between father and son that was also an exposition scene from the beginning of American History X.
January 14, 2026 at 2:14 AM
Just a tender moment between father and son that was also an exposition scene from the beginning of American History X.
It's wild — there's an interview where Adams was asked to list his favorite strips and explain them, and the big reveal is that he usually thought he was making a completely different joke.
He saw Wally as a pure villain, and the jokes involving him were meant to be at his expense.
He saw Wally as a pure villain, and the jokes involving him were meant to be at his expense.
January 13, 2026 at 6:35 PM
It's wild — there's an interview where Adams was asked to list his favorite strips and explain them, and the big reveal is that he usually thought he was making a completely different joke.
He saw Wally as a pure villain, and the jokes involving him were meant to be at his expense.
He saw Wally as a pure villain, and the jokes involving him were meant to be at his expense.
To be fair, his mom was kinda scary.
January 11, 2026 at 11:01 PM
To be fair, his mom was kinda scary.
Tbt to Halloween when I dressed as the IRA but my friend's house had more of a grown ups drinking wine vibe.
January 10, 2026 at 3:04 AM
Tbt to Halloween when I dressed as the IRA but my friend's house had more of a grown ups drinking wine vibe.
They might offer him immunity to testify against Kilmar Ábrego García.
January 4, 2026 at 10:34 PM
They might offer him immunity to testify against Kilmar Ábrego García.
My man looks like he was just told he’s “too sad” to play Willy Loman.
December 30, 2025 at 2:32 AM
My man looks like he was just told he’s “too sad” to play Willy Loman.
What’s this $500 for “taint protection film?”
December 18, 2025 at 5:37 PM
What’s this $500 for “taint protection film?”
Someone who once claimed Al Qaeda slashed her tires.
November 26, 2025 at 11:54 PM
Someone who once claimed Al Qaeda slashed her tires.
Some people are simply mis-wired to find deranged psychopathic killers attractive, and RFK Jr. is the most highly accomplished living serial murderer you can sext with.
Charlie Manson had plenty of admirers, and he wasn't wealthy, high status, or nearly as prolific.
Charlie Manson had plenty of admirers, and he wasn't wealthy, high status, or nearly as prolific.
November 26, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Some people are simply mis-wired to find deranged psychopathic killers attractive, and RFK Jr. is the most highly accomplished living serial murderer you can sext with.
Charlie Manson had plenty of admirers, and he wasn't wealthy, high status, or nearly as prolific.
Charlie Manson had plenty of admirers, and he wasn't wealthy, high status, or nearly as prolific.
I’d sooner believe Tommy Chong never ‘directly consumed’ marijuana.
November 25, 2025 at 3:18 PM
I’d sooner believe Tommy Chong never ‘directly consumed’ marijuana.
Try to think of images you remember from the news, even semi-recently. Can you recall the headlines next to them?
Human memory is too fallible to put fake imagery next to stories. You can’t assume the memory of it being bunk will persist longer than the visual of a red tractor following an ostrich.
Human memory is too fallible to put fake imagery next to stories. You can’t assume the memory of it being bunk will persist longer than the visual of a red tractor following an ostrich.
November 22, 2025 at 10:54 PM
Try to think of images you remember from the news, even semi-recently. Can you recall the headlines next to them?
Human memory is too fallible to put fake imagery next to stories. You can’t assume the memory of it being bunk will persist longer than the visual of a red tractor following an ostrich.
Human memory is too fallible to put fake imagery next to stories. You can’t assume the memory of it being bunk will persist longer than the visual of a red tractor following an ostrich.
I was never under the impression you made it — obviously you wouldn’t.
I’m just asking you to consider that images like this don’t become *less* credible when they’re next to honest reporting.
I’m just asking you to consider that images like this don’t become *less* credible when they’re next to honest reporting.
November 22, 2025 at 10:46 PM
I was never under the impression you made it — obviously you wouldn’t.
I’m just asking you to consider that images like this don’t become *less* credible when they’re next to honest reporting.
I’m just asking you to consider that images like this don’t become *less* credible when they’re next to honest reporting.
When I follow the embedded link to the PressProgress site, I see this article, under your byline, with an AI image of the thing these people incorrectly think exists.
November 22, 2025 at 8:29 PM
When I follow the embedded link to the PressProgress site, I see this article, under your byline, with an AI image of the thing these people incorrectly think exists.
You're an otherwise reputable media outlet using an AI slop image of protesting farmers to illustrate a story about how people are being conned into thinking farmers are protesting.
Are you really going to blame them for believing the things they see on @pressprogress.ca?
Are you really going to blame them for believing the things they see on @pressprogress.ca?
November 22, 2025 at 8:15 PM
You're an otherwise reputable media outlet using an AI slop image of protesting farmers to illustrate a story about how people are being conned into thinking farmers are protesting.
Are you really going to blame them for believing the things they see on @pressprogress.ca?
Are you really going to blame them for believing the things they see on @pressprogress.ca?
We heard you like 5th amendment rights, so we're asserting our 5th amendment right to not give evidence about willfully violating your 5th amendment rights.
November 19, 2025 at 4:57 PM
We heard you like 5th amendment rights, so we're asserting our 5th amendment right to not give evidence about willfully violating your 5th amendment rights.
I'd have guessed Nirvana.
November 18, 2025 at 2:26 PM
I'd have guessed Nirvana.
Nobody in this inbox will be missed.
November 14, 2025 at 12:58 AM
Nobody in this inbox will be missed.
"We need to cut SNAP because there are 186,000 dead people on SNAP!"
*cuts SNAP*
"We need to cut SNAP because there are 286,000 dead people on SNAP!"
*cuts SNAP*
"We need to cut SNAP because there are 286,000 dead people on SNAP!"
November 13, 2025 at 7:37 PM
"We need to cut SNAP because there are 186,000 dead people on SNAP!"
*cuts SNAP*
"We need to cut SNAP because there are 286,000 dead people on SNAP!"
*cuts SNAP*
"We need to cut SNAP because there are 286,000 dead people on SNAP!"
Were you made aware of Epstein’s curious relationship with the Sulzbergers while covering him?
What made the Gates relationship newsier than the one with Punch?
It seems like either you knew about it and sat on it to protect your boss’ family, or you weren’t privy to what NYT was sitting on.
What made the Gates relationship newsier than the one with Punch?
It seems like either you knew about it and sat on it to protect your boss’ family, or you weren’t privy to what NYT was sitting on.
November 13, 2025 at 7:08 PM
Were you made aware of Epstein’s curious relationship with the Sulzbergers while covering him?
What made the Gates relationship newsier than the one with Punch?
It seems like either you knew about it and sat on it to protect your boss’ family, or you weren’t privy to what NYT was sitting on.
What made the Gates relationship newsier than the one with Punch?
It seems like either you knew about it and sat on it to protect your boss’ family, or you weren’t privy to what NYT was sitting on.
Blue voters, you’re in an abusive relationship.
It’s *always* sunshine and love and unity when they sober up. But they are not sorry, nothing has changed since they told you to go fuck yourselves last night, and they’re going to tell you the same thing tonight.
Remove them until they respect you.
It’s *always* sunshine and love and unity when they sober up. But they are not sorry, nothing has changed since they told you to go fuck yourselves last night, and they’re going to tell you the same thing tonight.
Remove them until they respect you.
November 10, 2025 at 11:24 PM
Blue voters, you’re in an abusive relationship.
It’s *always* sunshine and love and unity when they sober up. But they are not sorry, nothing has changed since they told you to go fuck yourselves last night, and they’re going to tell you the same thing tonight.
Remove them until they respect you.
It’s *always* sunshine and love and unity when they sober up. But they are not sorry, nothing has changed since they told you to go fuck yourselves last night, and they’re going to tell you the same thing tonight.
Remove them until they respect you.
If Chuck went rogue and did this without the popular support of Senate Dems, he'd already be gone. Since 80% now claim to be against it, at least one in three of them must be lying.
Chris Murphy is either protecting the members of this MAGA sleeper cell or he's one of them.
Which is it?
Chris Murphy is either protecting the members of this MAGA sleeper cell or he's one of them.
Which is it?
November 10, 2025 at 5:52 PM
If Chuck went rogue and did this without the popular support of Senate Dems, he'd already be gone. Since 80% now claim to be against it, at least one in three of them must be lying.
Chris Murphy is either protecting the members of this MAGA sleeper cell or he's one of them.
Which is it?
Chris Murphy is either protecting the members of this MAGA sleeper cell or he's one of them.
Which is it?
It's too late to fire @shaheen.senate.gov and @senangusking.bsky.social for their betrayal, but you can ensure @stefanyshaheen.com and @anguskingiii.bsky.social never get the opportunity.
November 10, 2025 at 3:22 PM
It's too late to fire @shaheen.senate.gov and @senangusking.bsky.social for their betrayal, but you can ensure @stefanyshaheen.com and @anguskingiii.bsky.social never get the opportunity.
Had you not conspired with Schumer to pass this and blame the retirees, you'd be demanding he step down.
You aren't, and you deserve to lose.
You aren't, and you deserve to lose.
November 10, 2025 at 11:00 AM
Had you not conspired with Schumer to pass this and blame the retirees, you'd be demanding he step down.
You aren't, and you deserve to lose.
You aren't, and you deserve to lose.