Matt Hunt Gardner (he/him)
banner
matthuntgardner.bsky.social
Matt Hunt Gardner (he/him)
@matthuntgardner.bsky.social
Sociolinguist, nerd, cook 🏳️‍🌈
Lecturer QMUL, Visiting Scholar Oxford
Not gonna lie, twice I’ve missed my stop because I was too busy ranting online about them.
March 15, 2025 at 1:24 PM
I commute on the London Underground and I’ve been seeing new ones like every day.
March 15, 2025 at 1:18 PM
I refer you to earlier equally poor choices

bsky.app/profile/matt...
The use of “thou” was pretty much dead (outside Bible quotes) by the end of the 17th century. The use of “who” to introduce a restricted relative clause didn’t take off until the 19th century. Just saying. #linguistics
March 15, 2025 at 12:56 PM
I mean it’s just all kinds of incorrect. Make is correct in PDE if 2PP, but then taketh is incorrect. But, let’s say it’s 2PS, then it should be Takest. If Taketh was intended (which is weird, but let’s give them TBOTD) make should be makes (3PS).
March 15, 2025 at 12:53 PM
At this point I feel like someone should call Channel 4’s marketing department and give them a Middle English reader #channel4
March 14, 2025 at 6:03 PM
*prescriptivists wanted shall
March 10, 2025 at 8:51 PM
Though, it's not Channel 4ths fault. Apparently no one ever really followed the rules (though mostly it was using will where prescriptivists wanted will) not the cheeky shall here. From Fowler (1926: 525) section "shall & will". Such shade.
March 10, 2025 at 1:40 PM
I agree. In fact, I think it would actually probably make more sense as third person, either single or plural, "Blessed be he/she/they that/who resist(s) the call home".
March 10, 2025 at 1:18 PM
You are absolutely right! I should have clocked that too.
March 10, 2025 at 1:18 PM
Should deconstructing this be an exercise in my History of the English Language: 1500-1800 tutorials. All signs point to Aye!
March 10, 2025 at 12:12 PM
I actually find this interesting because it’s using borrowed prestige associated with grammatical choices from two different periods in the history of English.
March 10, 2025 at 10:53 AM
Also, contextually shouldn’t it be “Blessed be they who/that resist the call home”???
March 10, 2025 at 10:50 AM
I don’t think it’s wrong per se, I just think it’s spreading.
March 4, 2025 at 12:51 AM
This is true, one American, one British, but there are also corpora of spoken English that have none or nearly none so I wouldn’t read much into it.
March 3, 2025 at 6:34 PM
Here's a link to the data. Not the actual tokens but the counts and relative percentages

www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/pskyh...
www.dropbox.com
March 3, 2025 at 10:43 AM
Of note, "by purpose" was a common kiddie expression when I was growing up. So the "by accident" -- "on purpose" prescription was drilled in to us. Perhaps that's why my sociolinguistic sensor piques when I hear "on accident".
March 3, 2025 at 10:35 AM