Yep, agreed. Hopefully part of the calibration.

I assume this is to help him find it, right?

Seeing other reviewers' comments was really useful for me as an ECR, and still is.It helps me calibrate my own feedback, tone of voice and also educates me on science.

Imagine her horror when she discovers that the financial, mental health, housing support and advice that the poppy appeal provides the armed services community is the very essence of equality, diversity and inclusion.

It was a gorgeous day to be out in the woods...

LOL, police and justice system resources and drug rehabilitation costs, those well known things that cost the state nothing

Indeed! That's a shocking workplace recognition gap.

Kudos delivered

Agreed, but because the AI ppt output failed to draw the figure doesn't mean that the commonality doesn't exist. The test is just a bad one.

If I saw a dog, heard a dog but then failed to paint a dog, may just mean I can't paint.

It's a black box and to conclude "its not intelligent" from an uncontrolled unspecified task, is not all that insightful.

I'd just assume the failure to output a meaningful ppt slide was because it was a Mac user 😀

The truth is, surely, that we don't know what the reason for failure is. The same way we don't know why a mouse may struggle with transitive inference, or whatever

You were looking for intelligence, not employability.

I am unconvinced that *you* know what you are doing any more than AI 😉

Now repeat the experiment with a child, a person with dementia, or an ape.

What conclusions would you draw if they similarly failed to create a powerpoint slide?

White person on TV says there are no white people on TV