Marc Veneroso
banner
marcunderscore5.bsky.social
Marc Veneroso
@marcunderscore5.bsky.social
Retired federal government bridge engineer (design, contract, build). Some opinions, strongly held, generally correct, I think.
This brings to mind the milliHelen, the unit of force needed to launch a ship.
December 16, 2025 at 5:12 AM
I prefer "P, as in phone." Also "A as in aye, B as in bee, C as in cede, E as in eye," and so on. I'm still missing a few letters from my devil's alphabet. D, F, I, L, M, N, R, T, U, V, X, and Z. Rather pleased with Gee, Heir, Jay, Kay, Owe, Queue, Seas, and You, though.
December 16, 2025 at 5:07 AM
Key: One "could watch his positions take shape from one rally to the next—an offhand comment that got a strong reaction would become a talking point at the next rally, and then a core part of his pitch. And he took notice when the crowd got bored, pivoting to the lines that would fire them back up."
December 1, 2025 at 9:27 PM
Ironically the "ruling stems from a series of machinations that Mr. Trump undertook earlier ... based in part on the decision by another federal judge, Aileen M. Cannon, to dismiss an indictment against Mr. Trump over concerns about the appointment of Jack Smith as special counsel in that case."
November 25, 2025 at 12:43 AM
Beat me to it
November 25, 2025 at 12:41 AM
By all means, yes
November 25, 2025 at 12:37 AM
Ironically the "ruling stems from a series of machinations that Mr. Trump undertook earlier ... based in part on the decision by another federal judge, Aileen M. Cannon, to dismiss an indictment against Mr. Trump over concerns about the appointment of Jack Smith as special counsel in that case."
November 25, 2025 at 12:36 AM
Ironically the "ruling stems from a series of machinations that Mr. Trump undertook earlier ... based in part on the decision by another federal judge, Aileen M. Cannon, to dismiss an indictment against Mr. Trump over concerns about the appointment of Jack Smith as special counsel in that case."
November 25, 2025 at 12:35 AM
Ironically the "ruling stems from a series of machinations that Mr. Trump undertook earlier ... based in part on the decision by another federal judge, Aileen M. Cannon, to dismiss an indictment against Mr. Trump over concerns about the appointment of Jack Smith as special counsel in that case."
November 25, 2025 at 12:33 AM
Sort of.
For “manifestly unlawful” orders, the legal duty is to disobey is to refuse to obey. Where things are less clear is for lower down the command chain and less obviously illegal orders.
Excellent explainer in this piece by David French (former JAG).
www.nytimes.com/2025/11/23/o... Gift Link
Opinion | Trump Has Put the Military in an Impossible Situation
www.nytimes.com
November 25, 2025 at 12:24 AM
LLMs like ChatGPT should be thought of as tools. It's a bad idea to use a hammer to install a screw, but hammers *are* useful for driving nails. Also when using a LLM, check the work before submitting it. To extend the tool metaphor, measure twice, cut once.
bsky.app/profile/gaff...
I asked Google's Gemini AI whether a particular McDonald's Monopoly piece was rare.

There are only two pieces in this particular color.

It got it 100% wrong.

Wikipedia got it 100% right.
November 23, 2025 at 10:35 PM
My first name is Marc.
So I've had more than a few instances of someone opening with "Question, Marc" to which I reply "Exclamation point!"
September 19, 2025 at 4:32 AM
My first name is Marc.
So I've had more than a few instances of someone opening with "Question, Marc" to which I reply "Exclamation point!"
September 19, 2025 at 4:31 AM
Reposted by Marc Veneroso
I much prefer this president’s method of dealing with criticism over the current belching-emperor thumb up, thumb down, “Off with their head if they displease me,” iron fist, thin skin, snowflake, wittle pouty baby dictator’s bullshit.
September 18, 2025 at 1:52 PM
"Prosecutors almost never go in front of grand juries without obtaining indictments because they are in control of the information grand jurors hear and defendants are not allowed to have their lawyers in the room as evidence is presented."
Also, per @harrylitman.bsky.social
bsky.app/profile/harr...
“It is highly unusual for prosecutors to fail even once — let alone three times — to obtain an indictment from a grand jury given the way the process is stacked in favor of the government.”

Understatement. I’m going with unprecedented and unheard of.

www.nytimes.com/2025/08/25/u...
Prosecutors Fail 3 Times to Charge Woman With Felony Assault of F.B.I. Agent in D.C.
www.nytimes.com
August 26, 2025 at 8:31 PM