Marco Garofalo
banner
marcogarofalo.bsky.social
Marco Garofalo
@marcogarofalo.bsky.social
Senior economist @bankofengland PhD student @OxfordEconDept @UniofOxford ⚽️ Long-suffering AS Roma fan 🇮🇹🇳🇱🇪🇺🇬🇧 RTs ≠ endorsements, any views my own.
Website: https://sites.google.com/view/marco-garofalo/home
Link to paper w/ my amazing co-authors
Giovanni Rosso and Roger Vicquery
ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid...
ora.ox.ac.uk
June 21, 2025 at 9:45 AM
Specifically, our main innovation is to model sanctions as a currency-specific wedge on assets with different denominations. As US sanctions tighten the constraint on USD assets, financial intermediaries reallocate their portfolios towards other currencies.

[10/10]
April 15, 2025 at 5:57 PM
We plug this insight into a novel 3-country 3-currency framework, where financial sanctions are financial frictions.

[9/10]
April 15, 2025 at 5:57 PM
In other words: financial sanctions created a new currency-circuit-specific friction.

The risk of counterparts being cut off from the dollar payment system led to a rebalancing of portfolios towards the euro.

[8/10]
April 15, 2025 at 5:57 PM
Why the euro? We argue that the threat of US extra-territorial sanctions targeting users of the USD international payment system increased “settlement risk” for USD transactions, relative to EUR.

[7/10]
April 15, 2025 at 5:57 PM
Even more striking: the shift to euro lending happened regardless of the bank’s national jurisdiction, i.e. whether the ultimate parent was American, European/G7, or from a non-sanctioning country.

[6/10]
April 15, 2025 at 5:57 PM
So, banks didn’t necessarily leave, but they changed currency …

[5/10]
April 15, 2025 at 5:57 PM
We zoom in on the UK using confidential bank-level data, and show that most of the new euro lending came from the same banks that had decreased their USD lending: both banks that started lending in EUR (🟨👇), and those already lending in EUR which started to lend more
(🟦👇).

[4/10]
April 15, 2025 at 5:57 PM
But this aggregate picture disguises a striking underlying fact: the share of cross-border lending to Russia in US dollars fell from 65% to 25%. Meanwhile, euro-denominated lending rose from 20% to 45%. (Source: BIS LBS)

How did that happen?

[3/10]
April 15, 2025 at 5:57 PM
Following the 2014 invasion of Crimea and the imposition of financial sanctions on Russia, global cross-border lending to Russia declined significantly. (Source: BIS LBS)

[2/10]
April 15, 2025 at 5:57 PM
April 7, 2025 at 2:23 PM
bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/...

new version coming soon!
bankofengland.co.uk
April 7, 2025 at 2:17 PM