Marce Botin
marcebotin.bsky.social
Marce Botin
@marcebotin.bsky.social
Philosophy PhD at LOGOS - University of Barcelona. Consciousness
A posteriori Russellian physicalism has been revealed in my new paper forthcoming in the AJP, check it out! philpapers.org/rec/BOTAPR-2
Marcelino Botin, A Posteriori Russellian Physicalism, Revealed - PhilPapers
Physicalism is an attractive ontological view and revelation, the thesis that phenomenal concepts reveal the essence of phenomenal properties, is an attractive view of phenomenal concepts. I argue tha...
philpapers.org
October 29, 2025 at 4:23 PM
Reposted by Marce Botin
✦ 1. ¿Alguna vez te has preguntado si el tiempo es ilusorio? ¿O si el futuro está abierto? Mi #HiloTesis explora si la biología puede ayudarnos en estas disputas metafísicas sobre la naturaleza del tiempo.

@crueuniversidades.bsky.social @filarramendi.bsky.social ky.social @uneduniv.bsky.social
June 16, 2025 at 6:50 PM
Reposted by Marce Botin
My dear friend @marcebotin.bsky.social has published an incredible piece presenting a novel physicalist view that can account for revelation. He doesn't use bsky so i will undertake the task of publicising it because the article is too good to pass up.

philpapers.org/rec/BOTAPR-2
Marce Botin, A Posteriori Russellian Physicalism, Revealed. - PhilPapers
Physicalism is an attractive ontological view and revelation, the thesis that phenomenal concepts reveal the essence of phenomenal properties, is an attractive view of phenomenal concepts. I argue tha...
philpapers.org
June 3, 2025 at 9:56 AM
Happy that my first post in this app is a RT of my boy’s latest publication! Check it out!
My latest article is now published in Philosophia. I discuss infinite grounding, vicious regresses, and whether foundationalists have provided compelling arguments against the possibility of infinitism—spoiler alert: they haven’t! You can read it below:

link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Is it Possible to do Without the Fundamental? - Philosophia
This article argues that one of the main arguments against metaphysical infinitism—the argument from vicious infinite regress—is unsuccessful. I suggest that a proper interpretation of the argument ta...
link.springer.com
January 8, 2025 at 8:41 AM