I just keep turning over the phrase "moral injury on a national scale" being unable to better articulate what these repeated, high-profile things are doing.

/10 One could argue that this is not a serious discussion, because there is no serious argument that it’s sedition or treason to tell the truth about the Constitution. But this is an unserious time marked by unserious and frankly evil people.

/2 There is no federal crime of “sedition.” There is a federal crime of “seditious conspiracy,” which requires conspiring to overthrow the U.S. or hinder its laws by force.

www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/...

/6 Also, it is the obligation of every lawyer who takes their oath and the Constitution seriously to shun from legal society every single AUSA and DoJ lawyer participating in this. Strike their names from every book and tablet, every pylon and obelisk, every monument of the rule of law.

The original purpose of DC was concern that a state might not protect Congress from angry mobs and how did that work out.

This is ludicrous, utterly absurd, and quite possibly correct.

This is...sort of brilliant.