Malin Ödalen
@malinodalen.bsky.social
Researcher @pik-potsdam.bsky.social , modelling ocean’s role in climate system 🌬🌊🌎☀️👩💻📚
Palaeo/present/future, physics/bgc
From the Arctic, studying both poles ❄️
Check out @iapso-ecs.bsky.social http://iapsoecs.org
Views my own. she/her
Palaeo/present/future, physics/bgc
From the Arctic, studying both poles ❄️
Check out @iapso-ecs.bsky.social http://iapsoecs.org
Views my own. she/her
That’s encouraging, thank you! 😊
November 13, 2025 at 4:28 PM
That’s encouraging, thank you! 😊
If you are not in the starter packs that I manage myself (physical oceanography, polar oceans, organisations, or the smaller marine bgc pack) but think you should be, do let me know!
If you want to be in the starter packs managed by other people, it’s easier if you contact them directly
If you want to be in the starter packs managed by other people, it’s easier if you contact them directly
November 9, 2025 at 12:44 PM
If you are not in the starter packs that I manage myself (physical oceanography, polar oceans, organisations, or the smaller marine bgc pack) but think you should be, do let me know!
If you want to be in the starter packs managed by other people, it’s easier if you contact them directly
If you want to be in the starter packs managed by other people, it’s easier if you contact them directly
November 9, 2025 at 12:40 PM
November 9, 2025 at 12:35 PM
I also have a starter pack for marine biogeochemistry, but this one by @obialik.bsky.social is more complete:
go.bsky.app/TK79r4w
go.bsky.app/TK79r4w
November 9, 2025 at 12:35 PM
I also have a starter pack for marine biogeochemistry, but this one by @obialik.bsky.social is more complete:
go.bsky.app/TK79r4w
go.bsky.app/TK79r4w
No, those numbers are outdated.
November 3, 2025 at 1:56 AM
No, those numbers are outdated.
And I am not so pessimistic when it comes to global population numbers either
phys.org/news/2023-03...
phys.org/news/2023-03...
Report: Global population could peak below 9 billion in 2050s
In November 2022, the world crossed a milestone of 8 billion people, but a new analysis suggests the global population could peak just below 9 billion people in 2050 then start falling.
phys.org
November 2, 2025 at 6:28 PM
And I am not so pessimistic when it comes to global population numbers either
phys.org/news/2023-03...
phys.org/news/2023-03...
The root cause is CO₂ emissions, yes. The future trajectory of them depends on policy decisions. I do not belong to those who have given up on influencing those decisions. I’m sorry to see that you have.
November 2, 2025 at 6:24 PM
The root cause is CO₂ emissions, yes. The future trajectory of them depends on policy decisions. I do not belong to those who have given up on influencing those decisions. I’m sorry to see that you have.
Regardless, it is important to know what happens when we do manage to reduce them.
November 2, 2025 at 5:06 PM
Regardless, it is important to know what happens when we do manage to reduce them.