You cannot expose a "flaw" in reasoning that is post-hoc and flimsy by design.
The point is to exclude us, to dehumanize us, to deny us legibility.
Understand *that*. Attack *that*. Defend us on *those* grounds.
You cannot expose a "flaw" in reasoning that is post-hoc and flimsy by design.
The point is to exclude us, to dehumanize us, to deny us legibility.
Understand *that*. Attack *that*. Defend us on *those* grounds.