Conclusion. My feedback, instead of speculating. How about creating the governance around SAI? We'll keep deploying and do it transparently and welcome collaboration.

If people want to understand the risks, here is a paper from a credible expert in the field of SAI that lays out the risks of doing vs. not doing SAI: climate.uchicago.edu/insights/com...

I fed the paper into ChatGPT to check if there was actual data in the paper rather than speculation

This is a pretty bold claim, what evidence do you have that our company "demonstrates a serious risk of advancing solar geoengineering?"

How are you measuring this risk?

Why don't you mention the harm that Silverlinings caused in Alameda in your paper?

To drive the point home, we've already been cooling Earth using SO2, but badly and in the wrong place. If we literally stopped all SO2 emissions, we would live in a 1.9C world. We're proposing to put it higher where it doesn't have the negative effects of ground level SO2 emissions.

Moral hazard just became a moral obligation to deploy sulfate aerosols in the stratosphere to cool Earth.

Join us makesunsets.com/products/joi...

The kids are alright.

We can now!