At the same time you can`t even give us a definition that supports your views.
At the same time you can`t even give us a definition that supports your views.
b) If exceptions exist then there`s literally no argument you can make against the claim that Trans women are such an exception. Oh, except for deflect to other criteria....which also have exceptions...and then deflect again and again and again...
b) If exceptions exist then there`s literally no argument you can make against the claim that Trans women are such an exception. Oh, except for deflect to other criteria....which also have exceptions...and then deflect again and again and again...
And I don`t wanna hear accusations about me being in a brainwashed cult from a GC.
And I don`t wanna hear accusations about me being in a brainwashed cult from a GC.
a) something that doesn`t exist (bodies are not "organized around gamete production")
or b) somthing that has exceptions so you can`t exclude Trans people with it.
a) something that doesn`t exist (bodies are not "organized around gamete production")
or b) somthing that has exceptions so you can`t exclude Trans people with it.
*assigned
*assigned
No.
No.
And I`ve not seen a definition of sex so far that would make it impossible to change sex while holding onto your other views.
And I`ve not seen a definition of sex so far that would make it impossible to change sex while holding onto your other views.
Lol, do you actually believe we would use a term in ourselves that would call us male?
Lol, do you actually believe we would use a term in ourselves that would call us male?
Do I have to explain adjectives to you?
Do I have to explain adjectives to you?
The only one making contradictory claims here is you.
And I never said Trans women have Swyer or CAIS.
Did you read a single word I said?
The only one making contradictory claims here is you.
And I never said Trans women have Swyer or CAIS.
Did you read a single word I said?
More ad hominems, more blabla. Yet the truth still remains that you`re contradicting yourself.
More ad hominems, more blabla. Yet the truth still remains that you`re contradicting yourself.
Claiming that a claim is false because it "sounds laughable" is what science deniers do.
Claiming that a claim is false because it "sounds laughable" is what science deniers do.
Science is when you arbitrarily decide that SRY+ makes one group male and another one not male. 🙄
"Why don’t you say that the moon landings are fake and the earth is flat?"
Because I`m not a crank like you.
Science is when you arbitrarily decide that SRY+ makes one group male and another one not male. 🙄
"Why don’t you say that the moon landings are fake and the earth is flat?"
Because I`m not a crank like you.
Because you fuckheads arbitrarily decide that SRY+ makes one group male and another one not male.
Because you fuckheads arbitrarily decide that SRY+ makes one group male and another one not male.
Reality is, you`re full of sh*t and you`re trying to twist the truth so it fits your ideology.
Reality is, you`re full of sh*t and you`re trying to twist the truth so it fits your ideology.
2. You can`t just say "SRY defines male, except when it doesn`t fit me". That`s not how definitions work.
2. You can`t just say "SRY defines male, except when it doesn`t fit me". That`s not how definitions work.
bsky.app/profile/lynn...
bsky.app/profile/lynn...